H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 2-2

Francisco Clavet and Hicham Arazi are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Hicham Arazi leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Francisco Clavet leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 2002 Miami Masters second round 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Hicham Arazi
MAR Age 52 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 20, 2002* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Hicham Arazi #24 6-2 7-5 Francisco Clavet #84 Match data
Jul 12, 2001* Gstaad ATP 250 R32 Clay Francisco Clavet #57 6-1 7-6(6) Hicham Arazi #30 Match data
Jan 25, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Hicham Arazi #47 4-6 6-4 3-6 6-2 6-1 Francisco Clavet #32 Match data
Jun 20, 1997* Rosmalen ATP 250 R16 Grass Francisco Clavet #38 6-3 0-6 6-1 Hicham Arazi #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Hicham Arazi #793 #22 1,240 1,864 202 213 48.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Hicham Arazi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #184 1,486 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1995 1–5 16.7% #141 1,457 0 0
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1996 12–16 42.9% #79 1,550 0 0
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1997 28–27 50.9% #38 1,624 0 1
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1998 23–28 45.1% #36 1,714 0 1
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1999 27–27 50.0% #36 1,702 0 1
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 2000 31–26 54.4% #30 1,775 0 1
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 2001 30–23 56.6% #25 1,833 0 1
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2002 14–21 40.0% #90 1,699 0 1
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2003 21–20 51.2% #52 1,718 0 1
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2004 15–17 46.9% #62 1,711 0 1
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2005 0–2 0.0% #897 1,672 0 1
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 — — — — — — —