H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Francisco Clavet vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 1-1
Francisco Clavet and Hyung-Taik Lee are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2003 Miami Masters third round 4-6 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2003* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 4-6 6-2 6-1 | Francisco Clavet | Match data |
| Sep 21, 2001* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Francisco Clavet | 6-4 6-2 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | #911 | #18 | 1,613 | 1,869 | 388 | 340 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Francisco Clavet | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #290 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 39–29 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #100 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #38 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #34 | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #33 | 1,832 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #38 | 1,701 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #51 | 1,620 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,567 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |