H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Jaime Oncins H2H: 3-2

Francisco Clavet holds a 3–2 lead over Jaime Oncins in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Francisco Clavet leads 3–1 on clay, while Jaime Oncins leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jaime Oncins won the 1995 Santiago third round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Jaime Oncins
BRA Age 56 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 26, 1995* Santiago ATP 250 R32 Clay Jaime Oncins #260 6-3 6-2 Francisco Clavet #30 Match data
Apr 21, 1993* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Francisco Clavet #35 7-5 6-2 Jaime Oncins #37 Match data
Apr 30, 1992* Madrid ATP 250 R32 Clay Francisco Clavet #26 6-3 6-4 Jaime Oncins #86 Match data
Apr 16, 1992* Nice ATP 250 R32 Clay Francisco Clavet #28 6-4 2-6 6-1 Jaime Oncins #81 Match data
Nov 9, 1991* Sao Paulo ATP 250 SF Hard Jaime Oncins #74 6-4 6-3 Francisco Clavet #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Jaime Oncins #1,034 #34 773 1,796 61 86 41.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Jaime Oncins
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1988 1–2 33.3% #314 1,493 0 0
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1989 0–2 0.0% #263 1,471 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1990 0–4 0.0% #113 1,443 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1991 22–17 56.4% #64 1,677 0 0
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1992 24–18 57.1% #48 1,765 0 2
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1993 11–23 32.4% #133 1,578 0 2
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1994 1–7 12.5% #230 1,502 0 2
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1995 1–2 33.3% #222 1,505 0 2
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1996 0–2 0.0% #160 1,488 0 2
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 1997 0–6 0.0% #166 1,436 0 2
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 1998 1–2 33.3% #223 1,448 0 2
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2001 0–1 0.0% #1031 1,435 0 2
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 — — — — — — —