H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Francisco Clavet vs Jaime Yzaga H2H: 2-1
Francisco Clavet holds a 2–1 lead over Jaime Yzaga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Francisco Clavet leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 1993 Sao Paulo third round 3-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 1993* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Francisco Clavet | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| Aug 27, 1992* | Schenectady | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Francisco Clavet | 6-4 6-2 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| Jan 10, 1992* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jaime Yzaga | 6-4 7-6(4) | Francisco Clavet | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | #911 | #18 | 1,613 | 1,869 | 388 | 340 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francisco Clavet | Jaime Yzaga | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #290 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1990 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1991 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1992 | 39–29 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1993 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #100 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1994 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #38 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1995 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1996 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #34 | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 1997 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #33 | 1,832 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #38 | 1,701 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2000 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2001 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #51 | 1,620 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2002 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,567 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |