H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Jan Siemerink H2H: 1-0

Francisco Clavet holds a 1–0 lead over Jan Siemerink in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Francisco Clavet leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 1997 New Haven round of 32 1-6 6-3 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Jan Siemerink
NED Age 56 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Francisco Clavet #54 1-6 6-3 7-6(5) Jan Siemerink #29 Match data Aug 14, 1997* R32 New Haven Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Jan Siemerink #987 #14 1,863 1,902 261 262 49.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Jan Siemerink
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,458 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,502 0 0 1990 5–4 55.6% #135 1,541 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1991 30–21 58.8% #26 1,756 0 1
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,752 0 1 1992 22–27 44.9% #57 1,741 0 1
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,758 0 1 1993 24–25 49.0% #53 1,669 0 1
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,655 0 1 1994 16–19 45.7% #81 1,686 0 1
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,794 0 1 1995 37–29 56.1% #21 1,768 0 1
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,738 0 2 1996 35–28 55.6% #15 1,861 0 2
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,743 0 3 1997 18–27 40.0% #78 1,738 0 2
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,833 0 5 1998 38–24 61.3% #19 1,809 0 4
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,808 0 7 1999 17–25 40.5% #88 1,653 0 4
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,700 0 7 2000 7–14 33.3% #104 1,573 0 4
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2001 12–17 41.4% #127 1,563 0 4
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 2002 0–2 0.0% #438 1,531 0 4
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,565 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Francisco Clavet Jan Siemerink
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — 1990 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1990 1 2 3 33.3% 10 12 22 45.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 16 7 23 69.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 7 20 65.0%
22 1991 16 11 27 59.3% 21 13 34 61.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 10 12 22 45.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 7 16 56.3%
23 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 24 14 38 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1993 11 13 24 45.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5%
24 1993 2 7 9 22.2% 19 18 37 51.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 9 11 20 45.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0%
25 1994 1 1 2 50.0% 26 18 44 59.1% — — — — — — — — 1995 20 12 32 62.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
26 1995 4 4 8 50.0% 27 21 48 56.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1996 14 14 28 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 12 8 20 60.0%
27 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 29 16 45 64.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1997 10 12 22 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
28 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 28 12 40 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 18 11 29 62.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 12 6 18 66.7%
29 1998 9 9 18 50.0% 31 15 46 67.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 10 12 22 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
30 1999 8 13 21 38.1% 19 12 31 61.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
31 2000 9 14 23 39.1% 16 13 29 55.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 6 6 12 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
32 2001 18 13 31 58.1% 5 12 17 29.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2003 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 103 115 218 47.2% 265 194 459 57.7% 11 11 22 50.0% 9 20 29 31.0% — 129 121 250 51.6% 29 50 79 36.7% 28 30 58 48.3% 75 61 136 55.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 586/686 of Francisco Clavet's and 448/514 of Jan Siemerink's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Francisco Clavet Jan Siemerink
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 48/51 7.0 5.1 52.3% 75.3% 53.3% 58.8% 44.6% 64.8% 37.8%
22 1991 57/64 1.3 1.7 64.4% 65.1% 54.4% 58.6% 47.8% 61.1% 43.6% 1992 42/49 6.2 4.2 54.6% 72.8% 50.4% 63.1% 36.0% 62.7% 34.7%
23 1992 61/68 1.4 2.4 61.5% 66.2% 51.5% 55.4% 45.8% 60.4% 41.4% 1993 41/49 6.4 4.0 56.6% 76.6% 50.8% 62.6% 44.2% 65.2% 35.5%
24 1993 41/47 0.8 2.5 63.3% 60.2% 47.3% 51.1% 47.9% 55.4% 40.8% 1994 34/35 6.1 4.0 60.1% 75.5% 50.2% 63.0% 40.6% 65.5% 36.4%
25 1994 38/46 0.9 2.3 66.3% 64.0% 50.8% 54.9% 42.3% 59.4% 41.5% 1995 61/66 5.4 3.4 59.5% 73.7% 53.2% 64.8% 37.0% 65.3% 35.9%
26 1995 50/58 1.7 2.2 63.2% 65.6% 52.4% 53.6% 43.7% 60.5% 43.2% 1996 61/63 6.5 5.1 55.7% 75.7% 51.2% 65.5% 39.7% 64.8% 35.9%
27 1996 57/65 1.7 2.1 62.7% 65.2% 54.2% 52.7% 50.0% 61.3% 40.1% 1997 38/45 7.7 5.0 56.5% 74.2% 52.0% 66.9% 45.4% 64.4% 35.1%
28 1997 57/65 2.3 2.7 64.2% 65.4% 51.0% 52.4% 49.3% 60.2% 42.3% 1998 48/62 8.3 4.6 58.0% 77.7% 52.2% 65.2% 43.2% 66.9% 34.3%
29 1998 55/69 2.6 2.3 63.0% 68.0% 53.4% 57.1% 48.9% 62.6% 41.0% 1999 30/42 5.9 5.1 55.5% 73.7% 50.1% 56.9% 38.4% 63.1% 32.6%
30 1999 48/57 2.4 2.1 63.9% 66.7% 54.4% 56.9% 43.2% 62.0% 39.8% 2000 17/21 6.5 5.8 54.9% 73.6% 46.0% 64.2% 28.0% 61.4% 33.6%
31 2000 48/58 2.1 1.7 63.3% 68.2% 54.3% 52.5% 43.2% 63.1% 40.2% 2001 26/29 7.2 5.9 52.8% 75.6% 48.7% 56.6% 34.2% 62.7% 32.1%
32 2001 43/50 2.1 1.5 61.5% 66.1% 57.1% 59.7% 43.8% 62.5% 39.4% 2002 2/2 7.0 6.0 54.2% 76.2% 50.9% 42.9% 50.0% 64.8% 27.2%
33 2002 25/33 2.0 2.4 66.9% 63.6% 49.1% 53.6% 38.6% 58.5% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2003 6/6 1.8 2.2 64.4% 59.0% 46.9% 53.6% 48.3% 54.4% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 586/728 1.8 2.2 63.5% 65.5% 52.6% 54.9% 45.9% 60.7% 41.0% — 448/523 6.6 4.6 56.3% 75.1% 51.3% 62.8% 40.0% 64.6% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Francisco Clavet Jan Siemerink
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1988 1459 97.0 — — — — — +62 — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 1503 119.2 — — — — — +47 — 51.9% +0.11 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.79 1990 1541 108.1 — — — — +36 — — 52.6% -0.05 1–0 — — +1.03
21 1990 1576 125.5 — — — — -79 +53 — 46.3% -0.31 4–7 (36%) 8–4 (67%) — +0.01 1991 1757 143.1 +3.22 -0.58 1.074 51.5% +40 -248 -209 55.7% +0.44 11–10 (52%) 14–13 (52%) — -0.39
22 1991 1753 137.7 +0.53 +3.48 1.123 52.2% -104 +39 — 56.1% +0.66 9–7 (56%) 12–12 (50%) — +1.58 1992 1741 139.7 +1.78 -2.28 0.929 49.2% +31 -264 -201 43.8% -0.47 7–7 (50%) 10–6 (63%) — -2.48
23 1992 1758 149.6 -0.34 +2.57 1.046 50.7% -49 +112 — 53.9% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.12 1993 1669 136.6 +2.63 -1.58 1.020 50.4% +20 -120 -143 50.0% +0.11 8–11 (42%) 13–14 (48%) — +0.60
24 1993 1656 131.7 -3.73 +1.81 0.914 48.1% -52 +101 — 44.7% -0.47 9–8 (53%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19 1994 1686 139.2 +3.09 -0.26 1.054 50.9% -6 -131 — 48.8% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.29
25 1994 1794 140.9 +0.11 +1.74 1.023 50.1% — +77 — 55.9% +0.31 12–9 (57%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.48 1995 1768 149.5 +3.33 -1.32 1.035 50.6% -12 -116 -191 54.4% +0.22 11–8 (58%) 12–7 (63%) — -2.79
26 1995 1739 138.9 +0.04 +3.63 1.094 51.5% -102 +36 — 52.2% +0.30 7–13 (35%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.51 1996 1862 148.8 +2.53 -0.73 1.019 50.6% -13 -212 -147 54.0% +0.10 11–10 (52%) 30–16 (65%) — -1.35
27 1996 1744 149.6 -0.07 +1.86 1.036 50.6% -95 +130 — 56.8% +0.41 4–8 (33%) 12–5 (71%) — -1.96 1997 1739 137.7 +1.77 -1.30 0.987 50.2% +24 -75 -78 43.8% -0.28 7–12 (37%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.14
28 1997 1833 145.8 -0.25 +3.69 1.064 51.3% -124 +88 -238 56.2% +0.47 19–9 (68%) 12–11 (52%) — -1.22 1998 1810 145.1 +3.80 -2.09 1.038 50.9% +13 -234 -13 57.3% +0.46 15–7 (68%) 14–16 (47%) — -0.24
29 1998 1809 143.1 +0.62 +1.82 1.096 51.5% -108 +102 -151 58.4% +0.60 12–11 (52%) 7–16 (30%) — +2.29 1999 1654 132.5 +1.25 -2.98 0.884 48.1% +56 -141 +72 42.6% -0.49 6–7 (46%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.21
30 1999 1701 145.3 +0.45 +2.02 1.047 50.5% -14 +100 -25 51.3% +0.07 13–14 (48%) 14–12 (54%) — -2.18 2000 1573 115.4 -0.13 -3.10 0.870 47.9% +66 -41 +96 37.0% -0.83 3–5 (38%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.50
31 2000 1628 141.7 +0.86 +2.56 1.091 51.3% -11 +144 +39 49.6% +0.11 6–9 (40%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.35 2001 1564 122.8 +0.45 -4.28 0.859 47.7% +102 -52 +33 38.7% -0.73 6–4 (60%) 6–11 (35%) — -0.11
32 2001 1621 142.4 +0.69 +1.35 1.049 50.8% +64 -7 — 45.0% +0.02 8–8 (50%) 7–14 (33%) — +0.10 2002 1531 102.5 -1.57 -0.36 0.773 46.8% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.01
33 2002 1564 130.1 -1.84 -0.91 0.869 47.5% +66 +2 — 37.6% -0.63 4–8 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2003 1566 114.4 -1.08 +0.90 0.894 47.9% +83 — — 30.8% -1.77 0–2 — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1870 146.4 -0.14 +2.31 1.045 50.7% -39 +82 -98 51.9% +0.19 122–126 (49%) 122–122 (50%) 97.5 -0.54 — 1902 144.8 +2.44 -1.62 0.993 50.1% +20 -133 -71 49.5% -0.03 89–89 (50%) 131–118 (53%) 104.4 -1.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.