H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 0-2

Jeff Tarango holds a 2–0 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1999 Umag quarterfinal 7-5 5-7 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 31, 1999* Umag ATP 250 QF Clay Jeff Tarango #79 7-5 5-7 6-2 Francisco Clavet #23 Match data
Mar 5, 1998* Scottsdale ATP 250 R32 Hard Jeff Tarango #59 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 Francisco Clavet #31 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 — — — — — — —