H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Jimmy Arias H2H: 0-1

Jimmy Arias holds a 1–0 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jimmy Arias leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jimmy Arias won the 1990 Madrid third round 5-7 6-2 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet

ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H

0 – 1

1 main draw meetings

Jimmy Arias

USA Age 61 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

Date	Tournament	Category	Round	Surface	Winner	Score	Loser	Match
May 3, 1990*	Madrid	ATP 250	R32	Clay	Jimmy Arias #67	5-7 6-2 7-6	Francisco Clavet #180	Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000	Finals	500	250	Titles
Francisco Clavet	#911	#18	1,613	1,869	388	340	53.3%	0	0	0	0	8	8
Jimmy Arias	#714	#5	587	2,067	281	217	56.4%	0	1	0	0	4	5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Francisco Clavet							Jimmy Arias
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
15	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1980	3–5	37.5%	#255	1,530	0	0
16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1981	10–10	50.0%	#84	1,626	0	0
17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1982	30–17	63.8%	#21	1,858	0	1
18	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1983	47–15	75.8%	#6	2,045	0	5
19	1988	1–4	20.0%	#290	1,459	0	0	1984	35–19	64.8%	#14	1,879	0	5
20	1989	5–6	45.5%	#188	1,503	0	0	1985	32–21	60.4%	#21	1,810	0	5
21	1990	11–15	42.3%	#90	1,576	0	1	1986	18–19	48.6%	#48	1,668	0	5
22	1991	38–26	59.4%	#30	1,753	0	1	1987	22–18	55.0%	#34	1,720	0	5
23	1992	39–29	57.4%	#22	1,757	0	1	1988	7–14	33.3%	#106	1,615	0	5
24	1993	21–26	44.7%	#100	1,661	0	1	1989	17–17	50.0%	#92	1,696	0	5
25	1994	27–19	58.7%	#38	1,795	0	1	1990	24–26	48.0%	#60	1,681	0	5
26	1995	31–27	53.4%	#49	1,740	0	2	1991	23–19	54.8%	#63	1,691	0	5
27	1996	37–28	56.9%	#34	1,742	0	3	1992	4–8	33.3%	#195	1,644	0	5
28	1997	41–24	63.1%	#33	1,832	0	5	1993	5–4	55.6%	#178	1,664	0	5
29	1998	43–26	62.3%	#30	1,809	0	7	1994	3–4	42.9%	#334	1,638	0	5
30	1999	30–27	52.6%	#38	1,701	0	7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2000	28–30	48.3%	#49	1,627	0	7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2001	23–27	46.0%	#51	1,620	0	8	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2002	11–22	33.3%	#113	1,564	0	8	1998	1–1	50.0%	#711	1,640	0	5
34	2003	2–4	33.3%	#358	1,567	0	8	—	—	—	—	—	—	—