H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Francisco Clavet vs John McEnroe H2H: 1-0
Francisco Clavet holds a 1–0 lead over John McEnroe in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Francisco Clavet leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 1992 Madrid fourth round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 1992* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Francisco Clavet | 6-2 6-1 | John McEnroe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | #911 | #18 | 1,613 | 1,869 | 388 | 340 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| John McEnroe | #1,219 | #1 | 1,506 | 2,496 | 833 | 189 | 81.5% | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 63 | 76 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francisco Clavet | John McEnroe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #21 | 1,852 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #290 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 77–19 | 80.2% | #4 | 2,149 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 88–13 | 87.1% | #3 | 2,284 | 1 | 15 |
| 21 | 1990 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 83–16 | 83.8% | #2 | 2,255 | 2 | 24 |
| 22 | 1991 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #1 | 2,265 | 4 | 33 |
| 23 | 1992 | 39–29 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,278 | 4 | 38 |
| 24 | 1993 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #100 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 62–9 | 87.3% | #1 | 2,306 | 5 | 45 |
| 25 | 1994 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #38 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 71–2 | 97.3% | #1 | 2,475 | 7 | 58 |
| 26 | 1995 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 69–9 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,273 | 7 | 66 |
| 27 | 1996 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #34 | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 22–5 | 81.5% | #14 | 2,180 | 7 | 69 |
| 28 | 1997 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #33 | 1,832 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 30–10 | 75.0% | #10 | 2,094 | 7 | 69 |
| 29 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 29–9 | 76.3% | #11 | 2,023 | 7 | 71 |
| 30 | 1999 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #38 | 1,701 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 45–11 | 80.4% | #4 | 2,096 | 7 | 74 |
| 31 | 2000 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #13 | 1,967 | 7 | 75 |
| 32 | 2001 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #51 | 1,620 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #28 | 1,831 | 7 | 76 |
| 33 | 2002 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #20 | 1,882 | 7 | 76 |
| 34 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,567 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,871 | 7 | 76 |