H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Jonas Bjorkman H2H: 1-2

Jonas Bjorkman holds a 2–1 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jonas Bjorkman leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Francisco Clavet leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jonas Bjorkman won the 1997 US Open first round 6-2 6-4 6-4.

ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 2
3 main draw meetings
SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 27, 1997* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #17 6-2 6-4 6-4 Francisco Clavet #50 Match data
Feb 23, 1996* Antwerp ATP 250 R16 Carpet Francisco Clavet #51 7-6(1) 6-3 Jonas Bjorkman #27 Match data
Mar 15, 1995* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #44 6-3 6-7(5) 6-2 Francisco Clavet #36 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,036 395 341 53.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Jonas Bjorkman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,725 0 0
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1996 23–24 48.9% #69 1,708 0 0
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,006 0 3
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,745 0 4
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,778 0 4
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,736 0 4
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,838 0 5
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 2004 19–24 44.2% #70 1,686 0 5
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,744 0 6
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6
35 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,658 0 6
36 2008 7–12 36.8% #172 1,652 0 6