H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 3-1

Francisco Clavet holds a 3–1 lead over Juan Ignacio Chela in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Francisco Clavet leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 2002 Munich fourth round 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Juan Ignacio Chela
ARG Age 46 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 3, 2002* Munich ATP 250 R16 Clay Francisco Clavet #87 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 Juan Ignacio Chela #26 Match data
Mar 2, 2002* Acapulco ATP 250 QF Clay Juan Ignacio Chela #46 6-7(6) 6-2 7-6(5) Francisco Clavet #59 Match data
Jan 11, 2001* Auckland ATP 250 R32 Hard Francisco Clavet #47 6-3 4-6 6-3 Juan Ignacio Chela #65 Match data
Apr 14, 2000* Estoril ATP 250 R16 Clay Francisco Clavet #53 6-4 7-5 Juan Ignacio Chela #85 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Juan Ignacio Chela #967 #15 1,510 1,909 306 268 53.3% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Juan Ignacio Chela
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1999 0–3 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 2000 13–15 46.4% #63 1,540 0 1
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 2001 10–10 50.0% #70 1,594 0 1
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 2002 44–27 62.0% #23 1,783 0 2
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 2003 35–27 56.5% #38 1,762 0 2
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 2004 33–25 56.9% #26 1,735 0 3
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 2005 28–26 51.9% #39 1,691 0 3
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 2006 27–26 50.9% #33 1,721 0 3
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 2007 39–23 62.9% #20 1,796 0 4
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2008 11–12 47.8% #140 1,737 0 4
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2009 9–14 39.1% #73 1,731 0 4
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2010 28–24 53.8% #38 1,835 0 6
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2011 24–24 50.0% #29 1,737 0 6
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 2012 5–12 29.4% #176 1,634 0 6
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 — — — — — — —