H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Karim Alami H2H: 6-2

Francisco Clavet holds a 6–2 lead over Karim Alami in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Francisco Clavet leads 6–2 on clay. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 1999 Hamburg Masters third round 1-6 7-6(5) 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
6 – 2
8 main draw meetings
Karim Alami
MAR Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 6, 1999* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Francisco Clavet #21 1-6 7-6(5) 7-6(5) Karim Alami #47 Match data
Nov 5, 1998* Bogota ATP 250 R32 Clay Francisco Clavet #31 6-4 6-2 Karim Alami #76 Match data
Apr 9, 1998* Estoril ATP 250 R32 Clay Karim Alami #55 6-4 6-3 Francisco Clavet #35 Match data
Sep 25, 1997* Bucharest ATP 250 R32 Clay Francisco Clavet #50 6-3 6-3 Karim Alami #49 Match data
Sep 28, 1996* Palermo ATP 250 QF Clay Karim Alami #74 6-2 6-4 Francisco Clavet #27 Match data
Sep 12, 1996* Bucharest ATP 250 R32 Clay Francisco Clavet #27 6-4 6-3 Karim Alami #72 Match data
Jun 22, 1996* Bologna ATP 250 QF Clay Francisco Clavet #34 6-4 6-4 Karim Alami #57 Match data
Oct 27, 1994* Santiago ATP 250 R32 Clay Francisco Clavet #65 7-5 6-4 Karim Alami #102 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Karim Alami #1,418 #25 1,196 1,798 140 177 44.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Karim Alami
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #340 1,488 0 0
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1992 0–2 0.0% #437 1,463 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1993 2–2 50.0% #205 1,478 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1994 12–19 38.7% #88 1,506 0 0
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1995 15–14 51.7% #73 1,615 0 0
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1996 16–21 43.2% #56 1,650 0 2
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1997 23–27 46.0% #55 1,619 0 2
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1998 19–21 47.5% #72 1,644 0 2
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1999 26–22 54.2% #31 1,734 0 2
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 2000 21–28 42.9% #57 1,601 0 2
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2001 5–17 22.7% #203 1,512 0 2
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2002 1–2 33.3% #479 1,523 0 2
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2003 0–1 0.0% #990 1,510 0 2
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 — — — — — — —