H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 2-2

Francisco Clavet and Lleyton Hewitt are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 2003 Miami Masters second round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 19, 2003* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Francisco Clavet #178 6-4 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #1 Match data
Oct 6, 2001* Tokyo ATP 250 QF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #3 4-6 6-4 6-2 Francisco Clavet #60 Match data
Mar 10, 2001* Scottsdale ATP 250 SF Hard Francisco Clavet #40 6-3 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #6 Match data
Jan 14, 2000* Sydney ATP 250 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #21 6-3 6-2 Francisco Clavet #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 — — — — — — — 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30