H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Magnus Larsson H2H: 3-2

Francisco Clavet holds a 3–2 lead over Magnus Larsson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Francisco Clavet leads 2–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 2002 Hong Kong third round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Magnus Larsson
SWE Age 56 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 26, 2002* Hong Kong ATP 250 R32 Hard Francisco Clavet #101 6-4 6-4 Magnus Larsson #156 Match data
Feb 13, 1997* Marseille ATP 250 R32 Hard Magnus Larsson #46 2-6 6-4 6-3 Francisco Clavet #34 Match data
May 12, 1993* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Francisco Clavet #42 7-6(5) 3-6 7-5 Magnus Larsson #60 Match data
Apr 17, 1992* Nice ATP 250 R16 Clay Magnus Larsson #63 1-6 6-2 7-5 Francisco Clavet #28 Match data
Apr 9, 1992* Barcelona ATP 250 R32 Clay Francisco Clavet #27 6-1 4-6 6-2 Magnus Larsson #63 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Magnus Larsson #1,422 #10 2,222 2,040 293 217 57.5% 0 0 1 0 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Magnus Larsson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1988 2–2 50.0% #381 1,518 0 0
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #145 1,469 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1990 15–9 62.5% #56 1,680 0 1
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1991 21–21 50.0% #61 1,718 0 1
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1992 27–19 58.7% #34 1,802 0 3
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1993 29–25 53.7% #39 1,820 0 3
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1994 36–21 63.2% #19 2,004 0 6
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1995 32–13 71.1% #17 1,932 0 6
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1996 26–23 53.1% #46 1,765 0 6
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 1997 38–21 64.4% #25 1,891 0 6
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 1998 19–16 54.3% #43 1,828 0 6
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 1999 16–18 47.1% #95 1,729 0 6
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2000 13–6 68.4% #75 1,770 0 7
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2001 10–10 50.0% #136 1,728 0 7
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 2002 8–8 50.0% #152 1,673 0 7
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 2003 1–2 33.3% #507 1,689 0 7
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 — — — — — — —