H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Francisco Clavet vs Marc Rosset H2H: 2-2
Francisco Clavet and Marc Rosset are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Francisco Clavet leads 2–1 on clay, while Marc Rosset leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 1997 Stuttgart Outdoor third round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 55
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 1997* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Francisco Clavet | 7-5 6-1 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
| Feb 27, 1997* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Marc Rosset | 6-4 6-2 | Francisco Clavet | Match data |
| Jul 14, 1995* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Marc Rosset | 6-4 6-3 | Francisco Clavet | Match data |
| May 6, 1993* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Francisco Clavet | (w/o) | Marc Rosset | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | #911 | #18 | 1,613 | 1,869 | 388 | 340 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Marc Rosset | #1,490 | #9 | 2,069 | 1,950 | 398 | 334 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francisco Clavet | Marc Rosset | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #290 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #60 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1990 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #35 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1991 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1992 | 39–29 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #14 | 1,925 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1993 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #100 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,814 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 1994 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #38 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,771 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1995 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 32–31 | 50.8% | #31 | 1,630 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1996 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #34 | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1997 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #33 | 1,832 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #45 | 1,658 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | 1999 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #38 | 1,701 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 2000 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,597 | 0 | 14 |
| 32 | 2001 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #51 | 1,620 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,586 | 0 | 14 |
| 33 | 2002 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,546 | 0 | 14 |
| 34 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,567 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |