H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Mark Philippoussis H2H: 0-4

Mark Philippoussis holds a 4–0 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mark Philippoussis leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 2000 Indian Wells Masters third round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Mark Philippoussis
AUS Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 16, 2000* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Mark Philippoussis #35 7-5 6-3 Francisco Clavet #42 Match data
Jun 27, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Mark Philippoussis #11 7-5 6-4 6-4 Francisco Clavet #22 Match data
Mar 13, 1996* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Mark Philippoussis #28 6-3 6-0 Francisco Clavet #43 Match data
May 25, 1995* Bologna ATP 250 R32 Clay Mark Philippoussis #131 6-4 6-2 Francisco Clavet #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Mark Philippoussis #1,115 #8 2,296 2,022 287 190 60.2% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Mark Philippoussis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1994 1–3 25.0% #274 1,492 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1995 25–17 59.5% #38 1,764 0 0
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1996 31–22 58.5% #30 1,838 0 1
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1997 43–18 70.5% #18 1,852 0 4
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1998 31–19 62.0% #15 1,906 0 5
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1999 30–15 66.7% #19 1,892 0 7
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 2000 40–21 65.6% #11 1,894 0 8
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 2001 10–8 55.6% #104 1,803 0 9
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 2002 14–14 50.0% #80 1,772 0 9
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 2003 34–18 65.4% #9 1,881 0 10
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 2004 8–15 34.8% #109 1,669 0 10
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2005 9–11 45.0% #171 1,659 0 10
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2006 11–9 55.0% #114 1,732 0 11
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 — — — — — — —