H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 1-5

Mark Woodforde holds a 5–1 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Mark Woodforde leads 3–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 2000 Delray Beach third round 6-2 6-4.

ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 5
6 main draw meetings
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 2, 2000* Delray Beach ATP 250 R32 Hard Francisco Clavet #42 6-2 6-4 Mark Woodforde #126 Match data
Mar 5, 1999* Scottsdale ATP 250 R16 Hard Mark Woodforde #66 6-3 3-6 6-1 Francisco Clavet #24 Match data
Jan 21, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Mark Woodforde #67 4-6 7-6(6) 6-2 6-4 Francisco Clavet #52 Match data
Feb 18, 1993* Philadelphia ATP 250 R32 Carpet Mark Woodforde #41 6-1 6-3 Francisco Clavet #23 Match data
Nov 12, 1992* Antwerp ATP 250 R32 Carpet Mark Woodforde #61 7-6(6) 2-6 6-2 Francisco Clavet #22 Match data
Jan 17, 1992* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Mark Woodforde #87 6-7(4) 6-4 6-1 3-6 7-5 Francisco Clavet #32 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,922 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,546 0 1
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,800 0 2
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,710 0 3
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,716 0 3
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,631 0 3
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,814 0 3
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,760 0 4
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,800 0 4
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,731 0 4
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,611 0 4
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,584 0 4