H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Markus Hipfl H2H: 2-0

Francisco Clavet holds a 2–0 lead over Markus Hipfl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Francisco Clavet leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 1998 Austrian Open Kitzbühel round of 16 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Markus Hipfl
AUT Age 48 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Francisco Clavet #29 6-4 6-1 Markus Hipfl #266 Match data Jul 31, 1998* R16 Austrian Open Kitzbühel ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Francisco Clavet #101 6-0 6-4 Markus Hipfl Match data Jun 16, 1994* R32 St. Poelten ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Markus Hipfl #1,538 #63 678 1,686 55 78 41.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Markus Hipfl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #768 1,491 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #1275 1,485 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1996 1–2 33.3% #451 1,493 0 0
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,458 0 0 1997 0–2 0.0% #231 1,462 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,502 0 0 1998 3–3 50.0% #137 1,507 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1999 15–15 50.0% #76 1,591 0 0
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,752 0 1 2000 8–12 40.0% #119 1,571 0 0
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,758 0 1 2001 14–18 43.8% #76 1,574 0 0
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,655 0 1 2002 11–17 39.3% #125 1,566 0 0
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,794 0 1 2003 3–6 33.3% #279 1,509 0 0
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,738 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,743 0 3 2005 0–1 0.0% #1102 1,476 0 0
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,833 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,808 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,700 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,565 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Francisco Clavet Markus Hipfl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1989 — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1990 1 2 3 33.3% 10 12 22 45.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1991 16 11 27 59.3% 21 13 34 61.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 1 4 5 20.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 24 14 38 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2001 0 5 5 0.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 1993 2 7 9 22.2% 19 18 37 51.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 3 4 7 42.9% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 1994 1 1 2 50.0% 26 18 44 59.1% — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 1995 4 4 8 50.0% 27 21 48 56.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 29 16 45 64.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 28 12 40 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 9 9 18 50.0% 31 15 46 67.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 8 13 21 38.1% 19 12 31 61.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 9 14 23 39.1% 16 13 29 55.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 18 13 31 58.1% 5 12 17 29.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2003 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 103 115 218 47.2% 265 194 459 57.7% 11 11 22 50.0% 9 20 29 31.0% — 5 17 22 22.7% 49 53 102 48.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 586/686 of Francisco Clavet's and 116/133 of Markus Hipfl's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Francisco Clavet Markus Hipfl
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 1/1 1.0 6.0 66.2% 57.8% 39.1% 71.4% 0.0% 51.5% 27.7%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 1/1 2.0 6.0 49.1% 51.9% 39.3% 16.7% 20.0% 45.5% 34.5%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 3/3 1.7 4.3 43.0% 62.8% 49.0% 60.8% 40.6% 54.8% 40.5%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 1/2 1.0 2.0 50.9% 62.1% 44.6% 50.0% 80.0% 53.5% 46.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 5/6 2.4 1.6 67.6% 60.0% 50.6% 51.0% 33.6% 56.7% 38.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 26/30 2.3 1.8 66.3% 66.5% 49.6% 37.2% 42.6% 61.0% 42.0%
22 1991 57/64 1.3 1.7 64.4% 65.1% 54.4% 58.6% 47.8% 61.1% 43.6% 2000 16/20 2.1 2.2 64.6% 64.9% 50.9% 54.0% 52.2% 59.7% 39.1%
23 1992 61/68 1.4 2.4 61.5% 66.2% 51.5% 55.4% 45.8% 60.4% 41.4% 2001 26/32 2.1 2.9 61.4% 63.6% 48.6% 51.5% 38.5% 58.1% 39.9%
24 1993 41/47 0.8 2.5 63.3% 60.2% 47.3% 51.1% 47.9% 55.4% 40.8% 2002 27/28 3.3 2.2 65.1% 63.3% 50.1% 50.8% 46.7% 58.2% 39.0%
25 1994 38/46 0.9 2.3 66.3% 64.0% 50.8% 54.9% 42.3% 59.4% 41.5% 2003 9/9 0.9 1.9 71.7% 56.3% 41.2% 46.4% 38.4% 52.0% 33.3%
26 1995 50/58 1.7 2.2 63.2% 65.6% 52.4% 53.6% 43.7% 60.5% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1996 57/65 1.7 2.1 62.7% 65.2% 54.2% 52.7% 50.0% 61.3% 40.1% 2005 1/1 3.0 4.0 63.1% 60.4% 48.4% 71.4% 40.0% 56.0% 39.0%
28 1997 57/65 2.3 2.7 64.2% 65.4% 51.0% 52.4% 49.3% 60.2% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 55/69 2.6 2.3 63.0% 68.0% 53.4% 57.1% 48.9% 62.6% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 48/57 2.4 2.1 63.9% 66.7% 54.4% 56.9% 43.2% 62.0% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 48/58 2.1 1.7 63.3% 68.2% 54.3% 52.5% 43.2% 63.1% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 43/50 2.1 1.5 61.5% 66.1% 57.1% 59.7% 43.8% 62.5% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 25/33 2.0 2.4 66.9% 63.6% 49.1% 53.6% 38.6% 58.5% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2003 6/6 1.8 2.2 64.4% 59.0% 46.9% 53.6% 48.3% 54.4% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 586/728 1.8 2.2 63.5% 65.5% 52.6% 54.9% 45.9% 60.7% 41.0% — 116/133 2.3 2.4 64.2% 63.4% 48.8% 48.3% 42.9% 58.2% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Francisco Clavet Markus Hipfl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1491 99.9 +1.43 -2.60 0.570 41.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1485 101.0 +0.52 +1.20 0.633 40.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.11
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1493 109.0 -1.54 +0.61 0.895 47.2% — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.24
19 1988 1459 97.0 — — — — — +62 — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.84 1997 1462 98.2 -0.14 -2.54 0.995 49.8% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 0–1 — +0.24
20 1989 1503 119.2 — — — — — +47 — 51.9% +0.11 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.79 1998 1508 114.6 -0.71 +0.31 0.894 47.3% — +41 — 46.7% -0.40 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -0.23
21 1990 1576 125.5 — — — — -79 +53 — 46.3% -0.31 4–7 (36%) 8–4 (67%) — +0.01 1999 1591 128.5 -0.84 +2.00 1.075 50.9% -78 +74 — 52.6% +0.26 2–6 (25%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.06
22 1991 1753 137.7 +0.53 +3.48 1.123 52.2% -104 +39 — 56.1% +0.66 9–7 (56%) 12–12 (50%) — +1.58 2000 1571 126.9 -1.56 +0.32 0.972 49.4% -93 +109 — 43.1% -0.69 3–4 (43%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.49
23 1992 1758 149.6 -0.34 +2.57 1.046 50.7% -49 +112 — 53.9% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.12 2001 1574 134.5 -2.21 +1.33 0.953 49.0% -129 +138 -96 48.6% -0.18 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — -1.27
24 1993 1656 131.7 -3.73 +1.81 0.914 48.1% -52 +101 — 44.7% -0.47 9–8 (53%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19 2002 1567 127.4 -2.40 +0.71 0.934 48.7% -69 +91 — 47.1% -0.21 0–7 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.81
25 1994 1794 140.9 +0.11 +1.74 1.023 50.1% — +77 — 55.9% +0.31 12–9 (57%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.48 2003 1509 95.1 -5.51 -3.56 0.693 43.6% — +73 — 33.3% -2.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.38
26 1995 1739 138.9 +0.04 +3.63 1.094 51.5% -102 +36 — 52.2% +0.30 7–13 (35%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.51 2004 1495 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1996 1744 149.6 -0.07 +1.86 1.036 50.6% -95 +130 — 56.8% +0.41 4–8 (33%) 12–5 (71%) — -1.96 2005 1477 99.0 +0.24 -0.09 0.886 47.6% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.22
28 1997 1833 145.8 -0.25 +3.69 1.064 51.3% -124 +88 -238 56.2% +0.47 19–9 (68%) 12–11 (52%) — -1.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 1809 143.1 +0.62 +1.82 1.096 51.5% -108 +102 -151 58.4% +0.60 12–11 (52%) 7–16 (30%) — +2.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 1701 145.3 +0.45 +2.02 1.047 50.5% -14 +100 -25 51.3% +0.07 13–14 (48%) 14–12 (54%) — -2.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 1628 141.7 +0.86 +2.56 1.091 51.3% -11 +144 +39 49.6% +0.11 6–9 (40%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 1621 142.4 +0.69 +1.35 1.049 50.8% +64 -7 — 45.0% +0.02 8–8 (50%) 7–14 (33%) — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 1564 130.1 -1.84 -0.91 0.869 47.5% +66 +2 — 37.6% -0.63 4–8 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2003 1566 114.4 -1.08 +0.90 0.894 47.9% +83 — — 30.8% -1.77 0–2 — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1870 146.4 -0.14 +2.31 1.045 50.7% -39 +82 -98 51.9% +0.19 122–126 (49%) 122–122 (50%) 97.5 -0.54 — 1687 129.6 -1.94 +0.67 0.942 48.7% -90 +96 -96 46.1% -0.38 13–27 (33%) 17–14 (55%) 95.8 +0.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.