H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Markus Zoecke H2H: 1-0

Francisco Clavet holds a 1–0 lead over Markus Zoecke in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Francisco Clavet leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 1992 Hamburg Open round of 64 6-2 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Markus Zoecke
GER Age 58 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Francisco Clavet #25 6-2 3-6 6-2 Markus Zoecke #56 Match data May 6, 1992* R64 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Markus Zoecke #1,304 #48 791 1,743 66 101 39.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Markus Zoecke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,458 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1989 4–3 57.1% #108 1,557 0 0
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,752 0 1 1990 6–16 27.3% #167 1,530 0 0
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,758 0 1 1991 13–12 52.0% #57 1,659 0 0
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,655 0 1 1992 16–24 40.0% #102 1,633 0 0
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,794 0 1 1993 9–14 39.1% #154 1,601 0 0
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,738 0 2 1994 15–16 48.4% #57 1,625 0 1
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,743 0 3 1995 3–16 15.8% #321 1,487 0 1
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,833 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,808 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,700 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,565 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Francisco Clavet Markus Zoecke
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 1 2 3 33.3% 10 12 22 45.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1991 16 11 27 59.3% 21 13 34 61.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 2 7 9 22.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 24 14 38 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1991 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
24 1993 2 7 9 22.2% 19 18 37 51.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
25 1994 1 1 2 50.0% 26 18 44 59.1% — — — — — — — — 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9%
26 1995 4 4 8 50.0% 27 21 48 56.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
27 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 29 16 45 64.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1995 3 9 12 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 28 12 40 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 9 9 18 50.0% 31 15 46 67.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 8 13 21 38.1% 19 12 31 61.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 9 14 23 39.1% 16 13 29 55.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 18 13 31 58.1% 5 12 17 29.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2003 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 103 115 218 47.2% 265 194 459 57.7% 11 11 22 50.0% 9 20 29 31.0% — 45 55 100 45.0% 4 13 17 23.5% 5 11 16 31.2% 12 22 34 35.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 586/686 of Francisco Clavet's and 125/138 of Markus Zoecke's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Francisco Clavet Markus Zoecke
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 1991 57/64 1.3 1.7 64.4% 65.1% 54.4% 58.6% 47.8% 61.1% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 61/68 1.4 2.4 61.5% 66.2% 51.5% 55.4% 45.8% 60.4% 41.4% 1991 24/25 7.8 2.3 67.4% 70.6% 47.9% 63.0% 39.0% 63.3% 33.4%
24 1993 41/47 0.8 2.5 63.3% 60.2% 47.3% 51.1% 47.9% 55.4% 40.8% 1992 36/40 7.3 2.7 66.4% 73.0% 49.4% 60.1% 38.6% 65.1% 32.4%
25 1994 38/46 0.9 2.3 66.3% 64.0% 50.8% 54.9% 42.3% 59.4% 41.5% 1993 21/23 5.1 2.5 62.1% 70.8% 52.0% 63.0% 34.0% 63.7% 32.3%
26 1995 50/58 1.7 2.2 63.2% 65.6% 52.4% 53.6% 43.7% 60.5% 43.2% 1994 27/31 10.0 3.6 62.6% 75.0% 52.8% 58.6% 39.4% 66.4% 33.8%
27 1996 57/65 1.7 2.1 62.7% 65.2% 54.2% 52.7% 50.0% 61.3% 40.1% 1995 17/19 6.4 3.0 61.5% 68.4% 44.9% 43.9% 32.1% 59.5% 29.6%
28 1997 57/65 2.3 2.7 64.2% 65.4% 51.0% 52.4% 49.3% 60.2% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 55/69 2.6 2.3 63.0% 68.0% 53.4% 57.1% 48.9% 62.6% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 48/57 2.4 2.1 63.9% 66.7% 54.4% 56.9% 43.2% 62.0% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 48/58 2.1 1.7 63.3% 68.2% 54.3% 52.5% 43.2% 63.1% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 43/50 2.1 1.5 61.5% 66.1% 57.1% 59.7% 43.8% 62.5% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 25/33 2.0 2.4 66.9% 63.6% 49.1% 53.6% 38.6% 58.5% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2003 6/6 1.8 2.2 64.4% 59.0% 46.9% 53.6% 48.3% 54.4% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 586/728 1.8 2.2 63.5% 65.5% 52.6% 54.9% 45.9% 60.7% 41.0% — 125/167 7.5 2.8 64.4% 72.0% 49.7% 58.6% 37.2% 64.0% 32.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Francisco Clavet Markus Zoecke
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1988 1459 97.0 — — — — — +62 — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 1503 119.2 — — — — — +47 — 51.9% +0.11 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 1576 125.5 — — — — -79 +53 — 46.3% -0.31 4–7 (36%) 8–4 (67%) — +0.01 1989 1557 116.4 — — — — +11 — — 53.3% -0.20 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — +0.05
22 1991 1753 137.7 +0.53 +3.48 1.123 52.2% -104 +39 — 56.1% +0.66 9–7 (56%) 12–12 (50%) — +1.58 1990 1530 128.3 — — — — +36 +14 +50 35.1% -1.14 4–5 (44%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.96
23 1992 1758 149.6 -0.34 +2.57 1.046 50.7% -49 +112 — 53.9% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.12 1991 1660 124.9 +2.24 -3.03 0.910 48.9% -34 — — 50.0% -0.02 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.11
24 1993 1656 131.7 -3.73 +1.81 0.914 48.1% -52 +101 — 44.7% -0.47 9–8 (53%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19 1992 1634 142.2 +2.88 -3.68 0.930 49.1% +48 — -99 43.4% -0.46 5–9 (36%) 15–7 (68%) — -2.42
25 1994 1794 140.9 +0.11 +1.74 1.023 50.1% — +77 — 55.9% +0.31 12–9 (57%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.48 1993 1602 129.1 +1.34 -4.22 0.891 48.5% +17 — — 42.6% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 7–7 (50%) — +0.09
26 1995 1739 138.9 +0.04 +3.63 1.094 51.5% -102 +36 — 52.2% +0.30 7–13 (35%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.51 1994 1625 131.9 +2.84 -2.94 1.006 50.1% +25 — -27 50.6% +0.13 4–5 (44%) 6–10 (38%) — +1.40
27 1996 1744 149.6 -0.07 +1.86 1.036 50.6% -95 +130 — 56.8% +0.41 4–8 (33%) 12–5 (71%) — -1.96 1995 1487 119.8 -1.88 -5.11 0.731 45.2% +68 +2 +64 25.0% -1.35 1–4 (20%) 0–2 — -0.55
28 1997 1833 145.8 -0.25 +3.69 1.064 51.3% -124 +88 -238 56.2% +0.47 19–9 (68%) 12–11 (52%) — -1.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 1809 143.1 +0.62 +1.82 1.096 51.5% -108 +102 -151 58.4% +0.60 12–11 (52%) 7–16 (30%) — +2.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 1701 145.3 +0.45 +2.02 1.047 50.5% -14 +100 -25 51.3% +0.07 13–14 (48%) 14–12 (54%) — -2.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 1628 141.7 +0.86 +2.56 1.091 51.3% -11 +144 +39 49.6% +0.11 6–9 (40%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 1621 142.4 +0.69 +1.35 1.049 50.8% +64 -7 — 45.0% +0.02 8–8 (50%) 7–14 (33%) — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 1564 130.1 -1.84 -0.91 0.869 47.5% +66 +2 — 37.6% -0.63 4–8 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2003 1566 114.4 -1.08 +0.90 0.894 47.9% +83 — — 30.8% -1.77 0–2 — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1870 146.4 -0.14 +2.31 1.045 50.7% -39 +82 -98 51.9% +0.19 122–126 (49%) 122–122 (50%) 97.5 -0.54 — 1743 137.2 +1.84 -3.68 0.904 48.7% +24 +10 -18 42.8% -0.46 21–32 (40%) 38–34 (53%) 102.1 -1.37

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.