H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Martin Jaite H2H: 1-1

Francisco Clavet and Martin Jaite are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 1990 Hilversum quarterfinal 5-7 6-1 6-2.

ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 1
2 main draw meetings
ARG Age 61 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 28, 1990* Hilversum ATP 250 QF Clay Francisco Clavet #148 5-7 6-1 6-2 Martin Jaite #10 Match data
Aug 5, 1989* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 QF Clay Martin Jaite #26 7-6 6-3 Francisco Clavet #259 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Martin Jaite #1,214 #10 1,226 1,965 272 157 63.4% 0 0 0 0 12 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Martin Jaite
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 1–1 50.0% 1,504 0 0
18 1983 4–3 57.1% #285 1,546 0 0
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1984 11–8 57.9% #56 1,678 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1985 37–17 68.5% #20 1,813 0 1
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1986 34–15 69.4% #17 1,828 0 3
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1987 43–17 71.7% #14 1,890 0 5
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1988 22–19 53.7% #54 1,731 0 5
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1989 46–14 76.7% #11 1,947 0 9
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1990 31–19 62.0% #36 1,767 0 11
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1991 24–21 53.3% #46 1,706 0 12
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 1992 18–19 48.6% #120 1,678 0 12
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 1993 1–4 20.0% #245 1,601 0 12
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8