H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Michael Chang H2H: 2-4

Michael Chang holds a 4–2 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Francisco Clavet leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 2002 Tokyo second round 7-5 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 2, 2002* Tokyo ATP 250 R64 Hard Michael Chang #126 7-5 4-6 6-3 Francisco Clavet #90 Match data
Aug 28, 2002* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Michael Chang #132 7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 7-6(3) Francisco Clavet #84 Match data
May 31, 1998* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Francisco Clavet #37 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 6-4 Michael Chang #11 Match data
May 7, 1998* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Francisco Clavet #45 6-3 6-7(4) 6-2 Michael Chang #15 Match data
Jun 21, 1997* Rosmalen ATP 250 QF Grass Michael Chang #2 6-7(5) 7-6(8) 6-1 Francisco Clavet #38 Match data
Mar 8, 1992* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Michael Chang #15 6-0 6-1 Francisco Clavet #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Michael Chang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3
18 — — — — — — — 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 — — — — — — —