H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Michael Chang H2H: 2-4

Michael Chang holds a 4–2 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Francisco Clavet leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 2002 Japan Open round of 64 7-5 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michael Chang #126 7-5 4-6 6-3 Francisco Clavet #90 Match data Oct 2, 2002* R64 Japan Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Michael Chang #132 7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 7-6(3) Francisco Clavet #84 Match data Aug 28, 2002* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Francisco Clavet #37 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 6-4 Michael Chang #11 Match data May 31, 1998* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Francisco Clavet #45 6-3 6-7(4) 6-2 Michael Chang #15 Match data May 7, 1998* R32 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay
Michael Chang #2 6-7(5) 7-6(8) 6-1 Francisco Clavet #38 Match data Jun 21, 1997* QF Libéma Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Michael Chang #15 6-0 6-1 Francisco Clavet #29 Match data Mar 8, 1992* SF Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,113 649 305 68.0% 1 7 0 5 21 34

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Michael Chang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,977 1 3
18 — — — — — — — 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,919 1 4
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,458 0 0 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,003 1 5
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,502 0 0 1992 58–23 71.6% #6 1,966 1 8
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,752 0 1 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,006 1 19
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,758 0 1 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,011 1 23
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,655 0 1 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,991 1 26
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,794 0 1 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,911 1 31
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,738 0 2 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,848 1 33
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,743 0 3 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,790 1 33
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,833 0 5 2000 42–26 61.8% #32 1,807 1 34
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,808 0 7 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,699 1 34
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,700 0 7 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,624 1 34
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,565 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Francisco Clavet Michael Chang
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 13 8 21 61.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 0 5 100.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 20 8 28 71.4% 12 2 14 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 19 8 27 70.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3%
19 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1991 24 11 35 68.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 5 20 75.0%
20 1989 — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — 1992 40 8 48 83.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9%
21 1990 1 2 3 33.3% 10 12 22 45.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 43 10 53 81.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 6 18 66.7%
22 1991 16 11 27 59.3% 21 13 34 61.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 35 10 45 77.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 19 6 25 76.0%
23 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 24 14 38 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1995 31 10 41 75.6% 14 2 16 87.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 19 6 25 76.0%
24 1993 2 7 9 22.2% 19 18 37 51.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 48 9 57 84.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
25 1994 1 1 2 50.0% 26 18 44 59.1% — — — — — — — — 1997 42 9 51 82.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 1995 4 4 8 50.0% 27 21 48 56.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 19 9 28 67.9% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
27 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 29 16 45 64.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1999 21 17 38 55.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0%
28 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 28 12 40 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 27 16 43 62.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 1998 9 9 18 50.0% 31 15 46 67.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 11 13 24 45.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 1999 8 13 21 38.1% 19 12 31 61.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 5 13 18 27.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
31 2000 9 14 23 39.1% 16 13 29 55.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2001 18 13 31 58.1% 5 12 17 29.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2003 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 103 115 218 47.2% 265 194 459 57.7% 11 11 22 50.0% 9 20 29 31.0% — 404 172 576 70.1% 98 52 150 65.3% 30 25 55 54.5% 117 56 173 67.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 586/686 of Francisco Clavet's and 666/795 of Michael Chang's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Francisco Clavet Michael Chang
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 52/67 1.9 1.4 56.2% 68.0% 54.6% 55.2% 47.7% 61.8% 43.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 66/81 2.0 1.4 63.8% 68.8% 54.8% 55.7% 47.9% 63.5% 45.0%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 67/83 3.1 2.0 58.4% 69.7% 56.4% 64.2% 45.7% 64.3% 43.1%
22 1991 57/64 1.3 1.7 64.4% 65.1% 54.4% 58.6% 47.8% 61.1% 43.6% 1994 71/85 4.3 2.0 56.1% 73.8% 56.4% 58.8% 46.7% 66.1% 43.7%
23 1992 61/68 1.4 2.4 61.5% 66.2% 51.5% 55.4% 45.8% 60.4% 41.4% 1995 72/84 5.8 2.1 54.7% 76.9% 55.3% 60.0% 43.9% 66.9% 43.1%
24 1993 41/47 0.8 2.5 63.3% 60.2% 47.3% 51.1% 47.9% 55.4% 40.8% 1996 72/82 6.4 2.5 50.2% 77.2% 53.5% 61.0% 49.3% 65.3% 44.5%
25 1994 38/46 0.9 2.3 66.3% 64.0% 50.8% 54.9% 42.3% 59.4% 41.5% 1997 59/71 5.9 2.7 52.1% 74.6% 53.9% 63.7% 46.3% 64.7% 43.2%
26 1995 50/58 1.7 2.2 63.2% 65.6% 52.4% 53.6% 43.7% 60.5% 43.2% 1998 43/51 6.2 2.0 54.3% 74.8% 52.5% 61.7% 47.0% 64.6% 41.1%
27 1996 57/65 1.7 2.1 62.7% 65.2% 54.2% 52.7% 50.0% 61.3% 40.1% 1999 41/49 4.2 1.5 56.0% 72.0% 51.8% 56.3% 45.2% 63.0% 40.3%
28 1997 57/65 2.3 2.7 64.2% 65.4% 51.0% 52.4% 49.3% 60.2% 42.3% 2000 56/68 3.4 1.9 55.8% 70.2% 51.0% 59.6% 49.8% 61.7% 41.4%
29 1998 55/69 2.6 2.3 63.0% 68.0% 53.4% 57.1% 48.9% 62.6% 41.0% 2001 34/37 3.7 1.6 57.9% 69.7% 47.4% 57.7% 39.3% 60.1% 40.1%
30 1999 48/57 2.4 2.1 63.9% 66.7% 54.4% 56.9% 43.2% 62.0% 39.8% 2002 21/25 4.1 1.8 55.0% 70.1% 48.0% 55.0% 42.2% 60.2% 35.1%
31 2000 48/58 2.1 1.7 63.3% 68.2% 54.3% 52.5% 43.2% 63.1% 40.2% 2003 12/12 4.6 1.6 56.2% 69.1% 46.1% 31.4% 34.7% 59.2% 32.6%
32 2001 43/50 2.1 1.5 61.5% 66.1% 57.1% 59.7% 43.8% 62.5% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 25/33 2.0 2.4 66.9% 63.6% 49.1% 53.6% 38.6% 58.5% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2003 6/6 1.8 2.2 64.4% 59.0% 46.9% 53.6% 48.3% 54.4% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 586/728 1.8 2.2 63.5% 65.5% 52.6% 54.9% 45.9% 60.7% 41.0% — 666/954 4.3 1.9 55.9% 72.4% 53.6% 59.0% 46.2% 63.9% 42.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Francisco Clavet Michael Chang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1559 121.3 — — — — +34 — — 52.2% +0.09 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.24
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1842 146.2 — — — — +2 -249 -283 59.2% +0.61 8–5 (62%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.45
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1978 162.9 — — — — -29 -75 -313 68.9% +1.37 8–6 (57%) 8–5 (62%) — -2.14
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1920 158.6 — — — — +10 -23 -163 59.6% +0.75 11–6 (65%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.26
19 1988 1459 97.0 — — — — — +62 — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.84 1991 2003 160.6 +1.22 +4.46 1.132 52.5% +33 -67 -258 61.4% +0.91 18–7 (72%) 9–8 (53%) — -1.51
20 1989 1503 119.2 — — — — — +47 — 51.9% +0.11 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.79 1992 1966 166.2 +1.99 +7.08 1.233 54.0% +51 -96 — 65.1% +1.24 16–8 (67%) 8–18 (31%) — -1.65
21 1990 1576 125.5 — — — — -79 +53 — 46.3% -0.31 4–7 (36%) 8–4 (67%) — +0.01 1993 1992 160.0 +2.60 +5.19 1.207 53.4% +28 -138 -270 66.4% +1.22 23–10 (70%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.44
22 1991 1753 137.7 +0.53 +3.48 1.123 52.2% -104 +39 — 56.1% +0.66 9–7 (56%) 12–12 (50%) — +1.58 1994 2007 157.5 +3.82 +5.50 1.290 54.5% -9 -130 -197 71.3% +1.45 14–8 (64%) 19–7 (73%) — +0.39
23 1992 1758 149.6 -0.34 +2.57 1.046 50.7% -49 +112 — 53.9% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.12 1995 2011 165.8 +4.79 +5.90 1.302 54.6% +1 +38 — 70.0% +1.41 16–5 (76%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.91
24 1993 1656 131.7 -3.73 +1.81 0.914 48.1% -52 +101 — 44.7% -0.47 9–8 (53%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19 1996 1992 167.8 +3.39 +6.79 1.284 54.8% +58 -22 — 70.3% +1.62 16–3 (84%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.94
25 1994 1794 140.9 +0.11 +1.74 1.023 50.1% — +77 — 55.9% +0.31 12–9 (57%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.48 1997 1911 157.1 +2.72 +5.34 1.224 53.9% +68 +21 -176 66.3% +1.37 17–7 (71%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.71
26 1995 1739 138.9 +0.04 +3.63 1.094 51.5% -102 +36 — 52.2% +0.30 7–13 (35%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.51 1998 1849 144.8 +1.95 +2.83 1.163 52.9% +24 +87 — 65.1% +1.02 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — +2.82
27 1996 1744 149.6 -0.07 +1.86 1.036 50.6% -95 +130 — 56.8% +0.41 4–8 (33%) 12–5 (71%) — -1.96 1999 1791 141.4 +0.54 +2.18 1.090 51.5% +20 +46 — 54.0% +0.38 9–9 (50%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.91
28 1997 1833 145.8 -0.25 +3.69 1.064 51.3% -124 +88 -238 56.2% +0.47 19–9 (68%) 12–11 (52%) — -1.22 2000 1807 140.0 -0.26 +3.59 1.080 51.7% -11 -12 -72 56.2% +0.47 15–9 (63%) 13–10 (57%) — +0.86
29 1998 1809 143.1 +0.62 +1.82 1.096 51.5% -108 +102 -151 58.4% +0.60 12–11 (52%) 7–16 (30%) — +2.29 2001 1699 128.0 -1.43 +1.98 1.006 49.8% -10 +24 -7 44.9% -0.13 4–4 (50%) 3–9 (25%) — +0.59
30 1999 1701 145.3 +0.45 +2.02 1.047 50.5% -14 +100 -25 51.3% +0.07 13–14 (48%) 14–12 (54%) — -2.18 2002 1624 130.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.882 48.0% +20 +41 +34 35.3% -0.71 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.72
31 2000 1628 141.7 +0.86 +2.56 1.091 51.3% -11 +144 +39 49.6% +0.11 6–9 (40%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.35 2003 1551 127.1 -0.91 -1.10 0.800 46.1% +26 — — 24.1% -1.59 0–2 0–1 — -0.78
32 2001 1621 142.4 +0.69 +1.35 1.049 50.8% +64 -7 — 45.0% +0.02 8–8 (50%) 7–14 (33%) — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 1564 130.1 -1.84 -0.91 0.869 47.5% +66 +2 — 37.6% -0.63 4–8 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2003 1566 114.4 -1.08 +0.90 0.894 47.9% +83 — — 30.8% -1.77 0–2 — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1870 146.4 -0.14 +2.31 1.045 50.7% -39 +82 -98 51.9% +0.19 122–126 (49%) 122–122 (50%) 97.5 -0.54 — 2114 161.6 +2.11 +4.69 1.178 53.1% +21 -33 -160 62.8% +0.99 188–106 (64%) 147–149 (50%) 98.2 -0.36

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.