H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Michael Kohlmann H2H: 1-0

Francisco Clavet holds a 1–0 lead over Michael Kohlmann in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Francisco Clavet leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 1999 Wimbledon round of 128 6-2 1-6 3-6 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Michael Kohlmann
GER Age 52 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Francisco Clavet #22 6-2 1-6 3-6 7-5 6-4 Michael Kohlmann #115 Match data Jun 23, 1999* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Michael Kohlmann #1,019 #98 507 1,610 24 47 33.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Michael Kohlmann
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,458 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,752 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,758 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,655 0 1 1998 4–6 40.0% #110 1,531 0 0
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,794 0 1 1999 5–13 27.8% #153 1,543 0 0
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,738 0 2 2000 2–3 40.0% #217 1,542 0 0
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,743 0 3 2001 0–2 0.0% #113 1,532 0 0
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,833 0 5 2002 7–14 33.3% #165 1,560 0 0
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,808 0 7 2003 0–2 0.0% #312 1,560 0 0
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,700 0 7 2004 4–4 50.0% #282 1,593 0 0
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2005 2–2 50.0% #447 1,597 0 0
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 2007 0–1 0.0% #1507 1,550 0 0
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,565 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Francisco Clavet Michael Kohlmann
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 1 2 3 33.3% 10 12 22 45.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1991 16 11 27 59.3% 21 13 34 61.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 24 14 38 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1993 2 7 9 22.2% 19 18 37 51.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1994 1 1 2 50.0% 26 18 44 59.1% — — — — — — — — 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1995 4 4 8 50.0% 27 21 48 56.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 29 16 45 64.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 28 12 40 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 1 8 9 11.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 1998 9 9 18 50.0% 31 15 46 67.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1999 8 13 21 38.1% 19 12 31 61.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2000 9 14 23 39.1% 16 13 29 55.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
32 2001 18 13 31 58.1% 5 12 17 29.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 2003 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 103 115 218 47.2% 265 194 459 57.7% 11 11 22 50.0% 9 20 29 31.0% — 6 19 25 24.0% 12 15 27 44.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 586/686 of Francisco Clavet's and 61/71 of Michael Kohlmann's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Francisco Clavet Michael Kohlmann
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 1991 57/64 1.3 1.7 64.4% 65.1% 54.4% 58.6% 47.8% 61.1% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 61/68 1.4 2.4 61.5% 66.2% 51.5% 55.4% 45.8% 60.4% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1993 41/47 0.8 2.5 63.3% 60.2% 47.3% 51.1% 47.9% 55.4% 40.8% 1998 6/10 3.2 2.8 62.5% 61.8% 48.9% 50.4% 49.3% 56.6% 39.9%
25 1994 38/46 0.9 2.3 66.3% 64.0% 50.8% 54.9% 42.3% 59.4% 41.5% 1999 16/18 5.3 2.6 58.0% 67.6% 45.7% 50.9% 46.3% 58.8% 33.0%
26 1995 50/58 1.7 2.2 63.2% 65.6% 52.4% 53.6% 43.7% 60.5% 43.2% 2000 4/5 3.3 3.3 48.7% 50.6% 35.1% 40.5% 49.2% 45.6% 34.0%
27 1996 57/65 1.7 2.1 62.7% 65.2% 54.2% 52.7% 50.0% 61.3% 40.1% 2001 2/2 9.5 3.5 71.1% 63.8% 46.4% 53.1% 31.1% 57.9% 34.0%
28 1997 57/65 2.3 2.7 64.2% 65.4% 51.0% 52.4% 49.3% 60.2% 42.3% 2002 18/21 7.2 4.0 60.8% 73.1% 46.8% 58.7% 42.7% 62.8% 35.2%
29 1998 55/69 2.6 2.3 63.0% 68.0% 53.4% 57.1% 48.9% 62.6% 41.0% 2003 2/2 7.0 1.5 59.9% 59.7% 41.2% 34.7% 50.0% 52.0% 32.5%
30 1999 48/57 2.4 2.1 63.9% 66.7% 54.4% 56.9% 43.2% 62.0% 39.8% 2004 8/8 3.3 1.4 64.4% 71.2% 53.7% 35.4% 46.8% 64.4% 33.8%
31 2000 48/58 2.1 1.7 63.3% 68.2% 54.3% 52.5% 43.2% 63.1% 40.2% 2005 4/4 5.5 4.0 59.2% 67.7% 49.1% 48.3% 23.2% 60.3% 36.4%
32 2001 43/50 2.1 1.5 61.5% 66.1% 57.1% 59.7% 43.8% 62.5% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 25/33 2.0 2.4 66.9% 63.6% 49.1% 53.6% 38.6% 58.5% 36.0% 2007 1/1 7.0 5.0 64.9% 78.0% 44.4% 33.3% 20.0% 66.2% 28.4%
34 2003 6/6 1.8 2.2 64.4% 59.0% 46.9% 53.6% 48.3% 54.4% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 586/728 1.8 2.2 63.5% 65.5% 52.6% 54.9% 45.9% 60.7% 41.0% — 61/71 5.5 3.0 60.2% 67.8% 46.8% 49.5% 43.5% 59.6% 34.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Francisco Clavet Michael Kohlmann
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1988 1459 97.0 — — — — — +62 — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 1503 119.2 — — — — — +47 — 51.9% +0.11 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 1576 125.5 — — — — -79 +53 — 46.3% -0.31 4–7 (36%) 8–4 (67%) — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1991 1753 137.7 +0.53 +3.48 1.123 52.2% -104 +39 — 56.1% +0.66 9–7 (56%) 12–12 (50%) — +1.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 1758 149.6 -0.34 +2.57 1.046 50.7% -49 +112 — 53.9% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1993 1656 131.7 -3.73 +1.81 0.914 48.1% -52 +101 — 44.7% -0.47 9–8 (53%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19 1998 1531 111.9 -1.89 +0.22 0.920 48.7% +42 -8 — 39.1% -0.65 1–1 0–1 — +0.79
25 1994 1794 140.9 +0.11 +1.74 1.023 50.1% — +77 — 55.9% +0.31 12–9 (57%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.48 1999 1544 118.5 -2.54 -2.45 0.801 46.1% +3 -11 +32 31.3% -1.00 3–3 (50%) 0–5 (0%) — -0.88
26 1995 1739 138.9 +0.04 +3.63 1.094 51.5% -102 +36 — 52.2% +0.30 7–13 (35%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.51 2000 1542 110.1 -4.91 +0.31 0.624 40.9% — +17 — 50.0% -0.50 — 1–1 — -0.13
27 1996 1744 149.6 -0.07 +1.86 1.036 50.6% -95 +130 — 56.8% +0.41 4–8 (33%) 12–5 (71%) — -1.96 2001 1532 104.6 -3.02 -2.65 0.806 46.3% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 1–1 — +0.16
28 1997 1833 145.8 -0.25 +3.69 1.064 51.3% -124 +88 -238 56.2% +0.47 19–9 (68%) 12–11 (52%) — -1.22 2002 1560 122.6 +0.23 -1.63 0.947 49.6% -70 +72 -26 38.5% -0.48 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.38
29 1998 1809 143.1 +0.62 +1.82 1.096 51.5% -108 +102 -151 58.4% +0.60 12–11 (52%) 7–16 (30%) — +2.29 2003 1560 107.1 -2.81 +2.26 0.678 42.4% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — -0.37
30 1999 1701 145.3 +0.45 +2.02 1.047 50.5% -14 +100 -25 51.3% +0.07 13–14 (48%) 14–12 (54%) — -2.18 2004 1594 109.9 +0.41 -0.07 0.950 48.8% -42 — — 44.4% -0.39 2–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.03
31 2000 1628 141.7 +0.86 +2.56 1.091 51.3% -11 +144 +39 49.6% +0.11 6–9 (40%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.35 2005 1598 104.8 -1.67 -0.17 0.917 48.3% — +36 — 45.5% -0.91 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.29
32 2001 1621 142.4 +0.69 +1.35 1.049 50.8% +64 -7 — 45.0% +0.02 8–8 (50%) 7–14 (33%) — +0.10 2006 1579 99.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 1564 130.1 -1.84 -0.91 0.869 47.5% +66 +2 — 37.6% -0.63 4–8 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.77 2007 1550 98.0 +0.76 -2.43 0.840 47.7% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.05
34 2003 1566 114.4 -1.08 +0.90 0.894 47.9% +83 — — 30.8% -1.77 0–2 — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1535 99.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1529 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1487 92.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1870 146.4 -0.14 +2.31 1.045 50.7% -39 +82 -98 51.9% +0.19 122–126 (49%) 122–122 (50%) 97.5 -0.54 — 1610 116.3 -1.34 -1.15 0.858 47.4% -20 +23 -4 36.4% -0.76 10–12 (45%) 9–16 (36%) 95.8 -0.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.