H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Francisco Clavet vs Michel Kratochvil H2H: 0-2
Michel Kratochvil holds a 2–0 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Michel Kratochvil leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michel Kratochvil won the 2002 Rome Masters second round 4-6 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 47
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2002* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Michel Kratochvil | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | Francisco Clavet | Match data |
| Sep 27, 2001* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Michel Kratochvil | 7-6(3) 7-6(4) | Francisco Clavet | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | #911 | #18 | 1,613 | 1,869 | 388 | 340 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Michel Kratochvil | #868 | #35 | 990 | 1,761 | 70 | 89 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francisco Clavet | Michel Kratochvil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #290 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1990 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #93 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 39–29 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #69 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #100 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #131 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #38 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #167 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #34 | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1997 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #33 | 1,832 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #38 | 1,701 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2000 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2001 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #51 | 1,620 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2002 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,567 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |