H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Francisco Clavet vs Mikael Tillstrom H2H: 1-1
Francisco Clavet and Mikael Tillstrom are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Mikael Tillstrom won the 2000 Mallorca third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2000* | Mallorca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Mikael Tillstrom | 6-4 6-3 | Francisco Clavet | Match data |
| Aug 1, 1992* | San Marino | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Francisco Clavet | 6-0 6-1 | Mikael Tillstrom | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | #911 | #18 | 1,613 | 1,869 | 388 | 340 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Mikael Tillstrom | #506 | #39 | 966 | 1,831 | 107 | 108 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francisco Clavet | Mikael Tillstrom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #290 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #141 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #149 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 39–29 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #116 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #100 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #47 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #38 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #68 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #85 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #34 | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #79 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1997 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #33 | 1,832 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #80 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #38 | 1,701 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2000 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2001 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #51 | 1,620 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2002 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,567 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |