H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 1-1

Francisco Clavet and Mikhail Youzhny are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2001 Barcelona second round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 25, 2001* Barcelona ATP 250 R64 Clay Mikhail Youzhny #75 6-2 6-4 Francisco Clavet #33 Match data
Sep 28, 2000* Palermo ATP 250 R32 Clay Francisco Clavet #46 6-2 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #132 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Mikhail Youzhny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 — — — — — — — 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 — — — — — — — 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10