H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 6-2

Francisco Clavet holds a 6–2 lead over Nicolas Lapentti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Francisco Clavet leads 5–0 on clay, while Nicolas Lapentti leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 2000 Rome Masters third round 7-5 6-4.

ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
ECU Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 11, 2000* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Francisco Clavet #63 7-5 6-4 Nicolas Lapentti #8 Match data
Apr 15, 2000* Estoril ATP 250 SF Clay Francisco Clavet #53 6-4 6-3 Nicolas Lapentti #7 Match data
Oct 14, 1999* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Hard Nicolas Lapentti #14 7-6(1) 6-2 Francisco Clavet #32 Match data
Sep 1, 1999* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Nicolas Lapentti #16 6-3 7-5 4-6 6-4 Francisco Clavet #29 Match data
Nov 14, 1998* Santiago ATP 250 QF Clay Francisco Clavet #32 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Lapentti #99 Match data
Nov 2, 1997* Bogota ATP 250 F Clay Francisco Clavet #35 6-3 6-3 Nicolas Lapentti #83 Match data
Oct 25, 1997* Mexico City ATP 250 SF Clay Francisco Clavet #44 7-5 7-6(5) Nicolas Lapentti #89 Match data
Jun 25, 1997* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Francisco Clavet #39 7-5 6-1 6-3 Nicolas Lapentti #86 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,935 282 280 50.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Nicolas Lapentti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1996 11–19 36.7% #121 1,576 0 1
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,660 0 1
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,596 0 1
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,755 0 3
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,837 0 4
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,714 0 5
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,697 0 5
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 2004 7–14 33.3% #122 1,600 0 5
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,579 0 5
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,682 0 5
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,611 0 5
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2008 14–17 45.2% #86 1,658 0 5
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,668 0 5
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,582 0 5
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8