H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Pete Sampras H2H: 0-4

Pete Sampras holds a 4–0 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Pete Sampras leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 2001 Wimbledon first round 6-4 7-6(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Pete Sampras
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 2001* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Pete Sampras #6 6-4 7-6(5) 6-4 Francisco Clavet #56 Match data
Nov 4, 1999* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Pete Sampras #3 4-6 6-3 7-6(4) Francisco Clavet #32 Match data
May 30, 1997* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Pete Sampras #1 6-1 6-2 6-2 Francisco Clavet #31 Match data
Mar 20, 1997* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Pete Sampras #1 6-3 7-6(3) Francisco Clavet #36 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Pete Sampras #34 #1 5,792 2,265 737 208 78.0% 14 11 7 0 32 64

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Pete Sampras
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 10–10 50.0% #97 1,605 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1989 18–19 48.6% #81 1,699 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1990 51–19 72.9% #5 2,047 1 4
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1991 52–17 75.4% #6 2,091 1 8
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1992 66–15 81.5% #3 2,118 1 13
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1993 82–15 84.5% #1 2,126 3 21
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1994 74–9 89.2% #1 2,196 5 31
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1995 66–17 79.5% #1 2,134 7 36
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1996 66–10 86.8% #1 2,183 8 44
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1997 55–10 84.6% #1 2,187 10 52
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1998 61–18 77.2% #1 2,042 11 56
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 1999 38–9 80.9% #3 2,117 12 61
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2000 40–11 78.4% #3 2,068 13 63
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2001 33–15 68.8% #10 2,003 13 63
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2002 25–14 64.1% #13 1,977 14 64
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 — — — — — — —