H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 0-1

Radek Stepanek holds a 1–0 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Radek Stepanek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2002 Gstaad third round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Radek Stepanek
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 11, 2002* Gstaad ATP 250 R32 Clay Radek Stepanek #110 6-3 6-3 Francisco Clavet #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5
38 — — — — — — — 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5