H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 0-4

Richard Krajicek holds a 4–0 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Richard Krajicek leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 1996 Rome Masters third round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Richard Krajicek
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 16, 1996* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Richard Krajicek #25 6-4 6-4 Francisco Clavet #43 Match data
May 11, 1995* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Richard Krajicek #15 6-3 6-3 Francisco Clavet #33 Match data
Sep 2, 1992* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Richard Krajicek #15 7-6(2) 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 Francisco Clavet #24 Match data
May 27, 1992* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Richard Krajicek #13 7-6(4) 6-7(9) 6-3 7-6(5) Francisco Clavet #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Richard Krajicek #1,044 #4 3,130 2,044 408 207 66.3% 1 2 0 0 14 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Richard Krajicek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1991 26–20 56.5% #45 1,745 0 1
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1992 47–24 66.2% #10 1,950 0 3
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1993 36–20 64.3% #15 1,888 0 4
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1994 32–13 71.1% #17 1,883 0 7
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1995 40–20 66.7% #11 1,832 0 9
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1996 46–24 65.7% #7 1,876 1 10
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1997 50–19 72.5% #11 1,969 1 13
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1998 45–16 73.8% #10 1,975 1 15
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 1999 42–20 67.7% #10 1,879 1 17
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2000 26–15 63.4% #36 1,885 1 17
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2002 7–6 53.8% #112 1,839 1 17
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2003 11–10 52.4% #147 1,762 1 17
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 — — — — — — —