H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Richey Reneberg H2H: 1-2

Richey Reneberg holds a 2–1 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Richey Reneberg leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Richey Reneberg won the 1996 Stuttgart Masters second round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Richey Reneberg
USA Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 23, 1996* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Richey Reneberg #28 6-1 6-4 Francisco Clavet #34 Match data
Aug 28, 1991* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Francisco Clavet #37 7-6(6) 6-7(5) 6-4 6-2 Richey Reneberg #28 Match data
Mar 9, 1991* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Richey Reneberg #35 2-6 6-3 6-0 Francisco Clavet #92 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Richey Reneberg #867 #20 1,333 1,923 305 261 53.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Richey Reneberg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1986 2–3 40.0% #337 1,512 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1987 15–13 53.6% #79 1,671 0 0
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1988 14–19 42.4% #128 1,675 0 0
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1989 23–21 52.3% #80 1,689 0 0
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1990 37–25 59.7% #23 1,821 0 0
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1991 32–18 64.0% #27 1,805 0 1
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1992 18–20 47.4% #95 1,712 0 1
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 1993 37–26 58.7% #30 1,755 0 2
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 1994 33–24 57.9% #34 1,809 0 2
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 1995 22–23 48.9% #57 1,773 0 2
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 1996 37–24 60.7% #32 1,815 0 3
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 1997 18–20 47.4% #73 1,682 0 3
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 1998 10–15 40.0% #154 1,596 0 3
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 1999 6–9 40.0% #202 1,626 0 3
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 2000 1–1 50.0% #573 1,631 0 3