H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Francisco Clavet vs Slava Dosedel H2H: 1-3
Slava Dosedel holds a 3–1 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Slava Dosedel leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Slava Dosedel won the 2000 US Open first round 7-6(3) 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2000* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Slava Dosedel | 7-6(3) 6-4 6-1 | Francisco Clavet | Match data |
| Oct 1, 1994* | Palermo | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 6-0 5-7 6-1 | Francisco Clavet | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1994* | St. Poelten | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 7-5 6-4 | Francisco Clavet | Match data |
| Aug 10, 1989* | Prague | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Francisco Clavet | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | #911 | #18 | 1,613 | 1,869 | 388 | 340 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Francisco Clavet | Slava Dosedel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #290 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 39–29 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #100 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #38 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 |
| 1996 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #34 | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| 1997 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #33 | 1,832 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 |
| 1999 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #38 | 1,701 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 |
| 2000 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 |
| 2001 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #51 | 1,620 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,567 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |