H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Francisco Clavet vs Taylor Dent H2H: 1-1
Francisco Clavet and Taylor Dent are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 2002 Hong Kong fourth round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2002* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Francisco Clavet | 6-4 7-6(4) | Taylor Dent | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2000 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Taylor Dent | 6-3 6-4 | Francisco Clavet | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | #911 | #18 | 1,613 | 1,869 | 388 | 340 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Taylor Dent | #979 | #21 | 1,345 | 1,905 | 148 | 138 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francisco Clavet | Taylor Dent | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #410 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #290 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #181 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #124 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1991 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 28–12 | 70.0% | #33 | 1,883 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1992 | 39–29 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1993 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #100 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1994 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #38 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #574 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1995 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #34 | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #865 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1997 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #33 | 1,832 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #118 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1999 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #38 | 1,701 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2000 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2001 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #51 | 1,620 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2002 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,567 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |