H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 4-1

Francisco Clavet holds a 4–1 lead over Thomas Johansson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Francisco Clavet leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Johansson won the 2000 Stuttgart Masters second round 7-6(3) 6-7(2) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Thomas Johansson
SWE Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 1, 2000* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Thomas Johansson #58 7-6(3) 6-7(2) 6-4 Francisco Clavet #46 Match data
Jun 25, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Francisco Clavet #22 4-6 1-6 6-1 6-3 6-4 Thomas Johansson #21 Match data
Jun 28, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Francisco Clavet #36 7-6(4) 6-3 6-3 Thomas Johansson #41 Match data
Jan 15, 1998* Sydney Outdoor ATP 250 R32 Hard Francisco Clavet #32 6-3 7-5 Thomas Johansson #37 Match data
Apr 23, 1997* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Francisco Clavet #31 6-1 6-2 Thomas Johansson #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Thomas Johansson #586 #7 2,365 1,969 336 277 54.8% 1 1 0 0 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Thomas Johansson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1993 2–1 66.7% #422 1,535 0 0
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1994 0–2 0.0% #486 1,496 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1995 1–3 25.0% #117 1,492 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1996 28–21 57.1% #60 1,763 0 0
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1997 32–27 54.2% #39 1,699 0 2
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1998 46–30 60.5% #17 1,899 0 2
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1999 21–23 47.7% #39 1,725 0 3
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 2000 22–25 46.8% #39 1,825 0 4
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 2001 42–23 64.6% #18 1,875 0 6
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 2002 26–22 54.2% #14 1,746 1 7
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2004 29–20 59.2% #30 1,855 1 8
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2005 42–24 63.6% #13 1,892 1 9
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2006 11–16 40.7% #71 1,723 1 9
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 2007 23–23 50.0% #62 1,759 1 9
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 2008 11–17 39.3% #136 1,673 1 9
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 — — — — — — —