H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Thomas Muster H2H: 1-7

Thomas Muster holds a 7–1 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 6–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1996 Stuttgart Outdoor quarterfinal 6-2 6-4.

ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 7
8 main draw meetings
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 20, 1996* Stuttgart Outdoor ATP 250 QF Clay Thomas Muster #2 6-2 6-4 Francisco Clavet #33 Match data
Apr 13, 1996* Estoril ATP 250 QF Clay Thomas Muster #1 6-4 6-2 Francisco Clavet #45 Match data
Mar 9, 1996* Mexico City ATP 250 SF Clay Thomas Muster #2 6-3 2-6 6-1 Francisco Clavet #47 Match data
Sep 3, 1995* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Thomas Muster #3 0-6 6-4 6-3 7-5 Francisco Clavet #41 Match data
Aug 26, 1995* Umag ATP 250 SF Clay Thomas Muster #3 7-5 5-7 7-6(3) Francisco Clavet #47 Match data
Mar 4, 1995* Mexico City ATP 250 SF Clay Thomas Muster #19 7-6(3) 1-6 6-2 Francisco Clavet #39 Match data
Jun 19, 1993* Genova ATP 250 SF Clay Thomas Muster #15 6-2 6-0 Francisco Clavet #43 Match data
Jul 17, 1991* Stuttgart Outdoor ATP 250 R64 Clay Francisco Clavet #49 6-1 6-3 Thomas Muster #66 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,161 590 267 68.8% 1 8 0 0 35 44

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Thomas Muster
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% #311 1,533 0 0
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,611 0 0
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,740 0 1
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,914 0 5
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,877 0 5
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,862 0 8
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1992 39–22 63.9% #18 1,793 0 13
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,815 0 23
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 1,990 1 35
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,915 1 42
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,820 1 44
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,800 1 44
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,674 1 44
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 1 44
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44