H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Tim Henman H2H: 1-2

Tim Henman holds a 2–1 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Francisco Clavet leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 1999 Barcelona fourth round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 16, 1999* Barcelona ATP 250 R16 Clay Francisco Clavet #22 6-1 6-4 Tim Henman #7 Match data
Sep 13, 1997* Tashkent ATP 250 SF Hard Tim Henman #20 6-3 7-5 Francisco Clavet #55 Match data
Feb 22, 1997* Antwerp ATP 250 QF Hard Tim Henman #19 7-6(4) 6-4 Francisco Clavet #34 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 — — — — — — —