H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Todd Martin H2H: 0-5

Todd Martin holds a 5–0 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Todd Martin leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 1999 Indian Wells Open round of 32 6-2 3-6 7-6(4).

ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 5
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Todd Martin #11 6-2 3-6 7-6(4) Francisco Clavet #23 Match data Mar 11, 1999* R32 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Todd Martin #80 3-6 6-1 7-6(3) Francisco Clavet #32 Match data Jan 16, 1998* R16 Sydney International ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Todd Martin #9 6-0 6-0 6-2 Francisco Clavet #103 Match data May 27, 1994* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Todd Martin #125 6-1 6-2 Francisco Clavet #23 Match data Aug 22, 1992* QF Indianapolis ATP Championship Series modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Todd Martin #143 6-4 7-6(6) Francisco Clavet #36 Match data Sep 13, 1991* R16 Brasilia ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,064 398 223 64.1% 0 0 0 3 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Todd Martin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,458 0 0 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,515 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,502 0 0 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,652 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,752 0 1 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,758 0 1 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,945 0 3
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,655 0 1 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,913 0 4
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,794 0 1 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,923 0 5
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,738 0 2 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,913 0 5
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,743 0 3 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,833 0 5 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,808 0 7 2000 14–12 53.8% #55 1,862 0 8
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,700 0 7 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,816 0 8
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,785 0 8
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,842 0 8
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,688 0 8
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,565 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Francisco Clavet Todd Martin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1989 5 6 11 45.5% 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1990 1 2 3 33.3% 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1991 16 11 27 59.3% 21 13 34 61.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 2 10 80.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
23 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 24 14 38 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1994 22 8 30 73.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 8 6 14 57.1%
24 1993 2 7 9 22.2% 19 18 37 51.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 25 10 35 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
25 1994 1 1 2 50.0% 26 18 44 59.1% 1996 29 10 39 74.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 7 4 11 63.6%
26 1995 4 4 8 50.0% 27 21 48 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 7 3 10 70.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
27 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 29 16 45 64.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
28 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 28 12 40 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 30 11 41 73.2% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1998 9 9 18 50.0% 31 15 46 67.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 11 7 18 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 1999 8 13 21 38.1% 19 12 31 61.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 8 6 14 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
31 2000 9 14 23 39.1% 16 13 29 55.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 17 11 28 60.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
32 2001 18 13 31 58.1% 5 12 17 29.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
33 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
34 2003 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 103 115 218 47.2% 265 194 459 57.7% 11 11 22 50.0% 9 20 29 31.0% 227 122 349 65.0% 64 42 106 60.4% 59 25 84 70.2% 48 34 82 58.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 586/686 of Francisco Clavet's and 49/51 of Todd Martin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Francisco Clavet Todd Martin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 1991 57/64 1.3 1.7 64.4% 65.1% 54.4% 58.6% 47.8% 61.1% 43.6% —/—
23 1992 61/68 1.4 2.4 61.5% 66.2% 51.5% 55.4% 45.8% 60.4% 41.4% —/—
24 1993 41/47 0.8 2.5 63.3% 60.2% 47.3% 51.1% 47.9% 55.4% 40.8% —/—
25 1994 38/46 0.9 2.3 66.3% 64.0% 50.8% 54.9% 42.3% 59.4% 41.5% —/—
26 1995 50/58 1.7 2.2 63.2% 65.6% 52.4% 53.6% 43.7% 60.5% 43.2% —/—
27 1996 57/65 1.7 2.1 62.7% 65.2% 54.2% 52.7% 50.0% 61.3% 40.1% —/—
28 1997 57/65 2.3 2.7 64.2% 65.4% 51.0% 52.4% 49.3% 60.2% 42.3% —/—
29 1998 55/69 2.6 2.3 63.0% 68.0% 53.4% 57.1% 48.9% 62.6% 41.0% —/—
30 1999 48/57 2.4 2.1 63.9% 66.7% 54.4% 56.9% 43.2% 62.0% 39.8% —/—
31 2000 48/58 2.1 1.7 63.3% 68.2% 54.3% 52.5% 43.2% 63.1% 40.2% —/—
32 2001 43/50 2.1 1.5 61.5% 66.1% 57.1% 59.7% 43.8% 62.5% 39.4% 2003 24/26 10.0 5.2 58.9% 77.1% 51.2% 63.9% 49.9% 66.4% 36.8%
33 2002 25/33 2.0 2.4 66.9% 63.6% 49.1% 53.6% 38.6% 58.5% 36.0% 2004 25/25 10.5 4.1 62.5% 75.3% 49.7% 57.7% 31.7% 65.7% 35.3%
34 2003 6/6 1.8 2.2 64.4% 59.0% 46.9% 53.6% 48.3% 54.4% 40.8% —/—
Career 586/728 1.8 2.2 63.5% 65.5% 52.6% 54.9% 45.9% 60.7% 41.0% 49/621 10.3 4.6 60.8% 76.2% 50.4% 60.7% 40.6% 66.1% 36.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Francisco Clavet Todd Martin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1988 1459 97.0 +62 27.3% -1.27 0–1 0–1 +0.84 1990 1516 114.1 +28 40.0% 0.00 2–0 0–4 (0%) +0.50
20 1989 1503 119.2 +47 51.9% +0.11 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) +0.79 1991 1652 125.4 -62 -40 -7 55.8% +0.56 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) +1.12
21 1990 1576 125.5 -79 +53 46.3% -0.31 4–7 (36%) 8–4 (67%) +0.01 1992 1724 141.4 -19 -110 -46 55.8% +0.54 4–9 (31%) 8–8 (50%) +0.21
22 1991 1753 137.7 +0.53 +3.48 1.123 52.2% -104 +39 56.1% +0.66 9–7 (56%) 12–12 (50%) +1.58 1993 1887 155.8 -16 -193 -64 62.4% +0.78 10–9 (53%) 16–17 (48%) -0.69
23 1992 1758 149.6 -0.34 +2.57 1.046 50.7% -49 +112 53.9% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 13–10 (57%) -1.12 1994 1945 157.2 -18 -177 +80 64.0% +0.94 19–8 (70%) 26–17 (60%) -1.38
24 1993 1656 131.7 -3.73 +1.81 0.914 48.1% -52 +101 44.7% -0.47 9–8 (53%) 3–6 (33%) -0.19 1995 1913 152.5 +27 -141 +46 62.5% +0.71 11–4 (73%) 20–12 (63%) -0.11
25 1994 1794 140.9 +0.11 +1.74 1.023 50.1% +77 55.9% +0.31 12–9 (57%) 7–7 (50%) -0.48 1996 1923 161.1 +26 -122 +82 66.3% +1.07 11–10 (52%) 15–12 (56%) -1.56
26 1995 1739 138.9 +0.04 +3.63 1.094 51.5% -102 +36 52.2% +0.30 7–13 (35%) 9–6 (60%) +0.51 1997 1914 152.5 +27 63.3% +0.53 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) -1.34
27 1996 1744 149.6 -0.07 +1.86 1.036 50.6% -95 +130 56.8% +0.41 4–8 (33%) 12–5 (71%) -1.96 1998 1999 161.9 +10 -105 -16 64.0% +0.82 12–7 (63%) 19–11 (63%) -4.34
28 1997 1833 145.8 -0.25 +3.69 1.064 51.3% -124 +88 -238 56.2% +0.47 19–9 (68%) 12–11 (52%) -1.22 1999 1914 156.7 +32 +22 +54 63.2% +0.70 14–10 (58%) 26–16 (62%) -0.18
29 1998 1809 143.1 +0.62 +1.82 1.096 51.5% -108 +102 -151 58.4% +0.60 12–11 (52%) 7–16 (30%) +2.29 2000 1862 141.9 +57 +9 +96 54.5% +0.48 3–4 (43%) 7–10 (41%) -0.87
30 1999 1701 145.3 +0.45 +2.02 1.047 50.5% -14 +100 -25 51.3% +0.07 13–14 (48%) 14–12 (54%) -2.18 2001 1816 132.4 +63 -59 +147 51.3% -0.17 6–3 (67%) 6–5 (55%) -0.33
31 2000 1628 141.7 +0.86 +2.56 1.091 51.3% -11 +144 +39 49.6% +0.11 6–9 (40%) 10–9 (53%) -2.35 2002 1786 147.1 +51 -34 +125 58.3% +0.40 6–6 (50%) 14–10 (58%) -2.19
32 2001 1621 142.4 +0.69 +1.35 1.049 50.8% +64 -7 45.0% +0.02 8–8 (50%) 7–14 (33%) +0.10 2003 1842 133.5 +2.69 +0.10 1.096 51.8% +8 -108 +98 61.8% +0.46 1–5 (17%) 9–6 (60%) -0.41
33 2002 1564 130.1 -1.84 -0.91 0.869 47.5% +66 +2 37.6% -0.63 4–8 (33%) 6–6 (50%) -0.77 2004 1688 130.3 +1.82 +0.03 1.029 50.4% +23 +23 +195 43.8% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) -1.17
34 2003 1566 114.4 -1.08 +0.90 0.894 47.9% +83 30.8% -1.77 0–2 +0.23
Career 1870 146.4 -0.14 +2.31 1.045 50.7% -39 +82 -98 51.9% +0.19 122–126 (49%) 122–122 (50%) 97.5 -0.54 2064 158.1 +2.25 +0.06 1.062 51.1% +15 -99 +51 60.5% +0.64 108–88 (55%) 185–143 (56%) 101.2 -2.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.