H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Todd Martin H2H: 0-5

Todd Martin holds a 5–0 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Todd Martin leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 1999 Indian Wells Masters third round 6-2 3-6 7-6(4).

ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 5
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 11, 1999* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Todd Martin #11 6-2 3-6 7-6(4) Francisco Clavet #23 Match data
Jan 16, 1998* Sydney Outdoor ATP 250 R16 Hard Todd Martin #80 3-6 6-1 7-6(3) Francisco Clavet #32 Match data
May 27, 1994* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Todd Martin #9 6-0 6-0 6-2 Francisco Clavet #103 Match data
Aug 17, 1992 Indianapolis ATP 250 QF Hard Todd Martin #125 6-1 6-2 Francisco Clavet #23 Match data
Sep 13, 1991* Brasilia ATP 250 R16 Carpet Todd Martin #143 6-4 7-6(6) Francisco Clavet #36 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,063 398 222 64.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Todd Martin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,508 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,648 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,943 0 3
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,912 0 4
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,926 0 5
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,914 0 5
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2000 14–11 56.0% #55 1,887 0 8
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,823 0 8
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,788 0 8
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,828 0 8
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,684 0 8
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8