H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Tomas Carbonell H2H: 7-1

Francisco Clavet holds a 7–1 lead over Tomas Carbonell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Francisco Clavet leads 7–0 on clay, while Tomas Carbonell leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 1997 Barcelona second round 6-3 1-6 6-4.

ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
7 1
8 main draw meetings
ESP Age 57 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 16, 1997* Barcelona ATP 250 R64 Clay Francisco Clavet #32 6-3 1-6 6-4 Tomas Carbonell #131 Match data
Jun 26, 1996* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Tomas Carbonell #49 7-6(5) 4-6 1-6 6-4 6-3 Francisco Clavet #32 Match data
May 15, 1996* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Francisco Clavet #43 7-6(3) 6-3 Tomas Carbonell #44 Match data
Sep 30, 1995* Palermo ATP 250 QF Clay Francisco Clavet #37 6-4 7-6(0) Tomas Carbonell #81 Match data
Nov 11, 1994* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R16 Clay Francisco Clavet #44 6-1 7-5 Tomas Carbonell #60 Match data
Nov 3, 1994* Montevideo ATP 250 R32 Clay Francisco Clavet #50 6-1 5-7 6-0 Tomas Carbonell #59 Match data
Oct 9, 1992* Athens ATP 250 R16 Clay Francisco Clavet #22 6-4 7-6(5) Tomas Carbonell #61 Match data
Apr 5, 1991* Estoril ATP 250 R16 Clay Francisco Clavet #88 6-2 7-6(5) Tomas Carbonell #67 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Tomas Carbonell #860 #40 900 1,776 193 222 46.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Tomas Carbonell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 1–3 25.0% #404 1,480 0 0
18 1987 4–3 57.1% #242 1,558 0 0
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1988 7–7 50.0% #209 1,573 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1989 15–15 50.0% #77 1,623 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1990 25–23 52.1% #76 1,708 0 0
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1991 14–26 35.0% #96 1,623 0 0
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1992 21–19 52.5% #65 1,658 0 1
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1993 18–28 39.1% #89 1,580 0 1
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1994 28–27 50.9% #62 1,639 0 1
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1995 26–26 50.0% #74 1,677 0 1
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 1996 21–25 45.7% #75 1,585 0 2
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 1997 8–13 38.1% #170 1,576 0 2
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 1998 5–5 50.0% #167 1,619 0 2
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 1999 0–2 0.0% #826 1,581 0 2
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8