H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Tommy Haas H2H: 1-1

Francisco Clavet and Tommy Haas are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 1999 Stockholm third round 7-5 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 11, 1999* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Tommy Haas #14 7-5 3-6 6-4 Francisco Clavet #34 Match data
Aug 17, 1998 Indianapolis ATP 250 R32 Hard Francisco Clavet #27 6-4 6-0 Tommy Haas #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 — — — — — — — 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15