H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 3-2

Francisco Clavet holds a 3–2 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Francisco Clavet leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vincent Spadea won the 1999 Monte Carlo Masters fourth round 6-3 2-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Vincent Spadea
USA Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 24, 1999* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Vincent Spadea #33 6-3 2-6 6-3 Francisco Clavet #21 Match data
Mar 20, 1999* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Francisco Clavet #22 7-5 4-6 6-4 Vincent Spadea #41 Match data
Nov 6, 1997* Santiago ATP 250 R32 Clay Francisco Clavet #33 7-6(4) 6-3 Vincent Spadea #83 Match data
Oct 3, 1997* Palermo ATP 250 R16 Clay Francisco Clavet #45 6-3 6-3 Vincent Spadea #91 Match data
Nov 9, 1995* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R32 Clay Vincent Spadea #79 6-2 3-6 6-3 Francisco Clavet #46 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Vincent Spadea #1,474 #18 1,629 1,876 310 348 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Francisco Clavet Vincent Spadea
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1993 1–5 16.7% #303 1,483 0 0
1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1994 11–13 45.8% #75 1,561 0 0
1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1995 21–28 42.9% #81 1,639 0 0
1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1996 27–22 55.1% #54 1,711 0 0
1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1997 20–26 43.5% #88 1,695 0 0
1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1998 28–27 50.9% #42 1,752 0 0
1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1999 33–27 55.0% #20 1,763 0 0
1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 2000 3–23 11.5% #213 1,545 0 0
1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 2001 1–3 25.0% #125 1,534 0 0
1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2002 13–17 43.3% #67 1,623 0 0
1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2003 34–25 57.6% #29 1,723 0 0
1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2004 39–25 60.9% #20 1,784 0 1
2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2005 21–24 46.7% #75 1,665 0 1
2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 2006 19–26 42.2% #73 1,627 0 1
2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 2007 24–28 46.2% #77 1,650 0 1
2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 2008 13–19 40.6% #76 1,657 0 1
— — — — — — — 2009 2–9 18.2% #295 1,526 0 1
— — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #1517 1,480 0 1