H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Wayne Ferreira H2H: 2-3

Wayne Ferreira holds a 3–2 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Wayne Ferreira leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Wayne Ferreira won the 2000 Australian Open third round 6-3 6-4 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Wayne Ferreira
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 23, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Wayne Ferreira #53 6-3 6-4 3-6 6-3 Francisco Clavet #39 Match data
Mar 10, 1999* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Francisco Clavet #23 6-3 6-2 Wayne Ferreira #24 Match data
Feb 11, 1999* Dubai ATP 250 R32 Hard Francisco Clavet #29 3-6 6-2 7-6(11) Wayne Ferreira #25 Match data
Jul 10, 1997* Gstaad ATP 250 R32 Clay Wayne Ferreira #26 3-6 6-4 6-4 Francisco Clavet #37 Match data
Mar 9, 1995* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Wayne Ferreira #12 6-3 3-6 6-4 Francisco Clavet #36 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Wayne Ferreira #1,099 #6 2,701 2,022 483 314 60.6% 0 2 0 0 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Wayne Ferreira
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1990 2–5 28.6% #173 1,529 0 0
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1991 26–21 55.3% #41 1,712 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1992 48–24 66.7% #12 1,847 0 2
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1993 38–25 60.3% #22 1,819 0 2
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1994 66–25 72.5% #12 1,923 0 7
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1995 55–25 68.8% #9 1,925 0 11
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1996 45–24 65.2% #10 1,838 0 13
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1997 26–22 54.2% #42 1,809 0 13
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1998 33–24 57.9% #26 1,823 0 13
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 1999 27–25 51.9% #53 1,704 0 13
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2000 41–21 66.1% #13 1,895 0 14
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2001 16–21 43.2% #62 1,707 0 14
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2002 24–18 57.1% #39 1,811 0 14
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2003 24–19 55.8% #26 1,762 0 15
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 2004 12–15 44.4% #128 1,692 0 15
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 — — — — — — —