H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Francisco Gonzalez vs Rod Frawley H2H: 1-0
Francisco Gonzalez holds a 1–0 lead over Rod Frawley in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Francisco Gonzalez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Francisco Gonzalez won the 1979 Sydney Indoor third round 7-5 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PAR
Age 70
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 73
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 1979* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Francisco Gonzalez | 7-5 2-6 6-3 | Rod Frawley | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Gonzalez | #997 | #40 | 0 | 1,758 | 105 | 157 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rod Frawley | #483 | #43 | 0 | 1,812 | 112 | 145 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francisco Gonzalez | Rod Frawley | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1975 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1977 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1978 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #77 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #74 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #173 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1981 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #142 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #98 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #86 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1983 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #99 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #44 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1984 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #82 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #89 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #140 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #87 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1986 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #100 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #385 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |