H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Francisco Roig vs Andrei Olhovskiy H2H: 1-1
Francisco Roig and Andrei Olhovskiy are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Francisco Roig leads 1–0 on clay, while Andrei Olhovskiy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Olhovskiy won the 1992 Schenectady third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1992* | Schenectady | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Andrei Olhovskiy | 6-1 6-3 | Francisco Roig | Match data |
| May 31, 1989* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Francisco Roig | 6-4 6-3 6-2 | Andrei Olhovskiy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Roig | #889 | #60 | 579 | 1,715 | 64 | 96 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andrei Olhovskiy | #1,310 | #49 | 690 | 1,750 | 113 | 162 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francisco Roig | Andrei Olhovskiy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #251 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1989 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #122 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #129 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #302 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #172 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #136 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #156 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #65 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1996 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #116 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #97 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #153 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #118 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #333 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #798 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–14 | 0.0% | #442 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,470 | 0 | 2 |