H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Francisco Roig vs Raul Antonio Viver H2H: 1-0
Francisco Roig holds a 1–0 lead over Raul Antonio Viver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Francisco Roig leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Francisco Roig won the 1992 San Marino third round 6-2 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 65
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 1992* | San Marino | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Francisco Roig | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Raul Antonio Viver | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Roig | #889 | #60 | 579 | 1,715 | 64 | 96 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Raul Antonio Viver | #957 | #94 | 267 | 1,566 | 20 | 49 | 29.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francisco Roig | Raul Antonio Viver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #300 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #251 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #122 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #129 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #172 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #156 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #116 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #260 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #153 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #333 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #798 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #524 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 |