H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Frank Dancevic vs Dustin Brown H2H: 0-1
Dustin Brown holds a 1–0 lead over Frank Dancevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dustin Brown leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dustin Brown won the 2010 Queen's Club second round 7-5 6-7(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 41
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JAM
Age 41
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2010* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | R64 | Grass | Dustin Brown | 7-5 6-7(4) 6-4 | Frank Dancevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frank Dancevic | #406 | #65 | 783 | 1,773 | 54 | 89 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dustin Brown | #1,058 | #64 | 778 | 1,903 | 61 | 96 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Frank Dancevic | Dustin Brown | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #434 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #527 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #143 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #92 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #151 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #165 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #167 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #118 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #72 | 1,868 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #363 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #203 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |