H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Frank Dancevic vs James Ward H2H: 1-0

Frank Dancevic holds a 1–0 lead over James Ward in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Frank Dancevic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Frank Dancevic won the 2009 Eastbourne Open second round 7-6(6) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Frank Dancevic
CAN Age 41 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
James Ward
GBR Age 39 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Frank Dancevic #126 7-6(6) 6-4 James Ward #224 Match data Jun 19, 2009* R16 Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Frank Dancevic #406 #65 783 1,771 54 90 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
James Ward #1,096 #89 573 1,716 15 50 23.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Frank Dancevic James Ward
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2002 1–2 33.3% — 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 0–1 0.0% #201 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 1–2 33.3% #171 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2005 2–6 25.0% #188 1,472 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #558 1,472 0 0
21 2006 6–9 40.0% #88 1,557 0 0 2008 0–2 0.0% #280 1,480 0 0
22 2007 16–18 47.1% #72 1,696 0 0 2009 1–3 25.0% #270 1,468 0 0
23 2008 6–11 35.3% #130 1,652 0 0 2010 2–4 33.3% #201 1,523 0 0
24 2009 9–11 45.0% #143 1,698 0 0 2011 4–4 50.0% #162 1,535 0 0
25 2010 2–3 40.0% #269 1,663 0 0 2012 1–4 20.0% #250 1,516 0 0
26 2011 2–6 25.0% #151 1,696 0 0 2013 0–3 0.0% #161 1,553 0 0
27 2012 1–5 16.7% #165 1,604 0 0 2014 4–10 28.6% #107 1,685 0 0
28 2013 2–3 40.0% #122 1,687 0 0 2015 3–10 23.1% #156 1,574 0 0
29 2014 2–6 25.0% #149 1,654 0 0 2016 0–3 0.0% #444 1,509 0 0
30 2015 0–3 0.0% #209 1,601 0 0 2017 0–2 0.0% #843 1,492 0 0
31 2016 3–3 50.0% #241 1,663 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2017 1–1 50.0% #363 1,658 0 0 2019 0–3 0.0% #318 1,513 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2021 0–1 0.0% #391 1,524 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Frank Dancevic James Ward
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2006 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2007 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2008 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
24 2009 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
25 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
28 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2014 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 2015 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2019 — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 32 61 93 34.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 21 23 44 47.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — 4 16 20 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 31 42 26.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 143/144 of Frank Dancevic's and 65/65 of James Ward's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Frank Dancevic James Ward
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2002 3/3 6.7 3.7 49.8% 68.8% 44.1% 52.2% 45.1% 56.5% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 1/1 8.0 5.0 49.1% 73.1% 44.4% 69.2% 30.8% 58.5% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 3/3 3.0 3.0 63.1% 75.9% 37.7% 39.9% 14.3% 61.5% 29.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 8/8 6.1 2.3 57.1% 66.2% 48.8% 55.0% 26.3% 58.1% 34.5% 2007 1/1 2.0 2.0 56.3% 63.0% 57.1% 16.7% 37.5% 60.4% 40.2%
21 2006 15/15 6.3 1.3 62.8% 70.9% 52.0% 60.1% 37.9% 64.0% 34.1% 2008 2/2 3.5 4.5 55.0% 65.1% 52.0% 50.0% 33.3% 59.7% 31.3%
22 2007 34/34 12.4 2.5 60.2% 75.4% 52.3% 59.8% 38.5% 66.0% 34.1% 2009 4/4 6.8 3.5 51.1% 78.5% 47.6% 54.9% 28.0% 63.5% 31.1%
23 2008 16/17 9.4 2.1 61.3% 73.3% 51.1% 65.5% 37.9% 64.5% 32.8% 2010 6/6 4.7 3.5 58.7% 71.5% 41.9% 64.2% 36.8% 59.5% 33.4%
24 2009 20/20 7.5 1.6 60.8% 74.2% 54.4% 56.4% 38.6% 66.5% 31.5% 2011 8/8 7.8 4.1 60.9% 74.7% 53.1% 65.6% 33.7% 66.1% 33.1%
25 2010 5/5 8.4 2.8 56.2% 75.4% 49.5% 63.0% 34.7% 63.8% 32.3% 2012 5/5 10.2 2.8 59.7% 69.5% 49.2% 55.9% 35.4% 61.7% 33.4%
26 2011 8/8 10.5 3.1 58.6% 68.7% 50.2% 52.8% 27.1% 60.8% 29.8% 2013 3/3 11.0 2.7 65.1% 72.5% 51.7% 59.8% 11.5% 65.3% 30.8%
27 2012 6/6 4.7 2.8 55.1% 61.7% 41.1% 49.4% 45.8% 52.1% 20.7% 2014 14/14 4.0 2.1 65.1% 66.0% 50.0% 55.1% 36.0% 60.3% 32.0%
28 2013 5/5 9.6 2.8 62.4% 69.0% 48.7% 61.0% 40.8% 61.5% 35.4% 2015 13/13 9.5 3.8 58.7% 73.4% 49.0% 65.5% 36.9% 63.3% 34.6%
29 2014 8/8 7.1 3.9 58.2% 67.9% 46.4% 51.2% 34.5% 58.9% 29.1% 2016 3/3 9.0 4.3 56.6% 69.5% 44.5% 44.4% 30.6% 58.6% 27.0%
30 2015 3/3 5.3 3.0 59.3% 71.1% 43.1% 55.0% 33.3% 59.6% 28.3% 2017 2/2 4.5 1.5 59.1% 67.2% 48.7% 46.7% — 59.1% 26.3%
31 2016 6/6 6.3 1.7 62.1% 74.2% 56.7% 71.1% 24.7% 67.9% 30.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 2/2 5.0 2.0 65.2% 76.9% 44.3% 50.0% 22.2% 65.7% 26.6% 2019 3/3 8.7 4.7 59.3% 67.8% 47.0% 54.4% 32.6% 59.3% 39.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 1/1 3.0 5.0 62.1% 73.2% 40.0% 33.3% 0.0% 60.6% 18.0%
Career — 143/144 8.6 2.3 59.9% 72.1% 50.4% 58.3% 35.7% 63.4% 31.9% — 65/65 7.0 3.3 60.1% 70.7% 48.9% 57.7% 32.2% 61.9% 32.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Frank Dancevic James Ward
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2002 1506 104.6 +0.04 -3.24 0.682 44.0% +22 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 1497 102.3 +2.47 -1.76 0.878 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1486 103.8 -0.52 -3.23 0.760 44.9% — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1473 101.3 -2.56 -1.42 0.825 46.8% +33 — — 27.8% -1.28 1–1 1–1 — +0.82 2007 1473 98.1 -1.20 -0.01 1.015 48.9% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.15
21 2006 1558 120.1 +0.72 -1.24 0.948 48.9% -17 — +44 46.2% -0.31 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.23 2008 1480 99.9 -0.72 -0.98 0.777 44.8% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.16
22 2007 1697 136.2 +2.37 -1.18 1.003 49.7% -6 — -95 48.4% -0.16 8–8 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.87 2009 1468 104.0 +0.38 -0.97 0.853 47.3% — — +101 22.2% -1.33 — 0–1 — -0.20
23 2008 1653 126.4 +1.17 -2.13 0.925 49.7% -7 — +11 44.7% -0.34 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.19 2010 1524 108.7 -1.53 -0.51 0.823 46.5% — — +70 27.3% -1.91 0–1 1–0 — -0.21
24 2009 1699 134.9 +1.81 -2.41 0.940 48.8% +28 — +6 43.5% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.65 2011 1536 110.4 +0.86 -0.34 0.979 49.6% — — +128 45.0% -0.25 2–1 (67%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.34
25 2010 1663 112.5 -0.81 -0.02 0.891 48.2% — — +83 50.0% -0.42 0–2 3–0 (100%) — -0.03 2012 1517 111.3 -0.28 -2.44 0.872 47.1% — — +91 36.8% -0.68 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.13
26 2011 1696 122.6 -2.16 -3.36 0.759 45.7% +7 — — 36.4% -0.95 1–2 (33%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.72 2013 1553 108.8 +0.68 +0.03 0.888 47.7% — — -15 22.2% -1.00 0–1 2–4 (33%) — -0.15
27 2012 1605 113.3 -3.12 -6.61 0.432 37.6% +71 — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.47 2014 1685 125.6 -1.96 -2.94 0.807 46.3% -11 — -162 29.4% -1.50 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.26
28 2013 1688 118.1 -0.19 -0.40 0.918 48.5% +6 — — 43.8% -0.44 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.09 2015 1575 118.0 -1.54 -0.18 0.942 49.0% -30 — -6 40.5% -0.50 0–7 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.50
29 2014 1655 115.5 -2.84 -3.79 0.710 44.6% +4 — — 33.3% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12 2016 1510 108.6 -0.43 +0.71 0.652 43.7% — — +38 12.5% -2.12 0–1 0–1 — -0.19
30 2015 1602 110.2 -0.20 -3.32 0.701 44.7% +41 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.04 2017 1492 100.2 -0.70 -1.02 0.644 42.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.04
31 2016 1663 114.3 -0.72 -0.87 0.948 49.4% — — +100 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.11 2018 1495 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 1658 105.5 -0.71 -1.04 0.776 46.9% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.57 2019 1514 108.3 -0.11 -1.23 0.963 49.3% — — +65 36.4% -0.45 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.10
33 2018 1596 104.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1590 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1524 102.7 -3.97 -1.72 0.457 42.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.15
35 2020 1577 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1772 127.2 +0.40 -2.03 0.872 47.8% +8 — +18 41.8% -0.57 23–32 (42%) 38–34 (53%) 98.0 +1.31 — 1716 116.3 -0.88 -1.12 0.856 47.3% -19 — +41 32.0% -1.05 5–22 (19%) 11–16 (41%) 87.9 -0.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.