H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Frank Dancevic vs Jimmy Wang

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Frank Dancevic vs Jimmy Wang.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Frank Dancevic
CAN Age 41 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Jimmy Wang
TPE Age 41 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jimmy Wang #147 2-6 6-2 6-1 6-4 Frank Dancevic #107 Match data Jun 24, 2014* Q3 Q Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Jimmy Wang #151 6-2 6-2 Frank Dancevic #214 Match data Jun 25, 2013* Q2 Q Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Frank Dancevic #406 #65 783 1,771 54 90 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jimmy Wang #1,017 #85 487 1,733 22 41 34.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Frank Dancevic Jimmy Wang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2002 1–2 33.3% — 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 0–1 0.0% #201 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 1–2 33.3% #171 1,486 0 0 2004 1–3 25.0% #184 1,510 0 0
20 2005 2–6 25.0% #188 1,472 0 0 2005 3–8 27.3% #100 1,514 0 0
21 2006 6–9 40.0% #88 1,557 0 0 2006 7–15 31.8% #148 1,554 0 0
22 2007 16–18 47.1% #72 1,696 0 0 2007 3–2 60.0% #148 1,571 0 0
23 2008 6–11 35.3% #130 1,652 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2009 9–11 45.0% #143 1,698 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2010 2–3 40.0% #269 1,663 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2011 2–6 25.0% #151 1,696 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #274 1,545 0 0
27 2012 1–5 16.7% #165 1,604 0 0 2012 2–3 40.0% #156 1,634 0 0
28 2013 2–3 40.0% #122 1,687 0 0 2013 1–3 25.0% #174 1,587 0 0
29 2014 2–6 25.0% #149 1,654 0 0 2014 4–5 44.4% #124 1,698 0 0
30 2015 0–3 0.0% #209 1,601 0 0 2015 0–1 0.0% #310 1,676 0 0
31 2016 3–3 50.0% #241 1,663 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2017 1–1 50.0% #363 1,658 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Frank Dancevic Jimmy Wang
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2005 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2006 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 2007 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2008 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2014 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2015 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 32 61 93 34.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 21 23 44 47.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — 13 25 38 34.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 13 22 40.9% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 143/144 of Frank Dancevic's and 63/63 of Jimmy Wang's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Frank Dancevic Jimmy Wang
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2002 3/3 6.7 3.7 49.8% 68.8% 44.1% 52.2% 45.1% 56.5% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 1/1 8.0 5.0 49.1% 73.1% 44.4% 69.2% 30.8% 58.5% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 3/3 3.0 3.0 63.1% 75.9% 37.7% 39.9% 14.3% 61.5% 29.3% 2004 4/4 4.3 2.5 69.0% 67.1% 56.8% 66.1% 41.0% 63.5% 36.0%
20 2005 8/8 6.1 2.3 57.1% 66.2% 48.8% 55.0% 26.3% 58.1% 34.5% 2005 11/11 3.1 2.0 62.1% 66.7% 52.1% 51.8% 49.6% 61.1% 34.3%
21 2006 15/15 6.3 1.3 62.8% 70.9% 52.0% 60.1% 37.9% 64.0% 34.1% 2006 22/22 3.5 2.2 57.7% 62.4% 48.8% 60.9% 38.9% 56.4% 38.9%
22 2007 34/34 12.4 2.5 60.2% 75.4% 52.3% 59.8% 38.5% 66.0% 34.1% 2007 5/5 3.6 1.8 66.4% 70.2% 45.4% 63.6% 49.5% 61.8% 42.4%
23 2008 16/17 9.4 2.1 61.3% 73.3% 51.1% 65.5% 37.9% 64.5% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 20/20 7.5 1.6 60.8% 74.2% 54.4% 56.4% 38.6% 66.5% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 5/5 8.4 2.8 56.2% 75.4% 49.5% 63.0% 34.7% 63.8% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 8/8 10.5 3.1 58.6% 68.7% 50.2% 52.8% 27.1% 60.8% 29.8% 2011 2/2 2.0 2.0 57.2% 64.5% 43.7% 54.4% 59.2% 55.7% 44.2%
27 2012 6/6 4.7 2.8 55.1% 61.7% 41.1% 49.4% 45.8% 52.1% 20.7% 2012 5/5 4.0 2.6 64.2% 64.3% 57.5% 65.2% 48.7% 62.1% 37.2%
28 2013 5/5 9.6 2.8 62.4% 69.0% 48.7% 61.0% 40.8% 61.5% 35.4% 2013 4/4 5.0 3.0 65.0% 62.3% 46.2% 46.9% 30.5% 56.9% 31.7%
29 2014 8/8 7.1 3.9 58.2% 67.9% 46.4% 51.2% 34.5% 58.9% 29.1% 2014 9/9 4.2 2.9 61.8% 66.1% 54.6% 53.7% 42.6% 61.4% 35.2%
30 2015 3/3 5.3 3.0 59.3% 71.1% 43.1% 55.0% 33.3% 59.6% 28.3% 2015 1/1 5.0 2.0 60.9% 68.7% 65.1% 71.4% 0.0% 67.3% 18.4%
31 2016 6/6 6.3 1.7 62.1% 74.2% 56.7% 71.1% 24.7% 67.9% 30.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 2/2 5.0 2.0 65.2% 76.9% 44.3% 50.0% 22.2% 65.7% 26.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 143/144 8.6 2.3 59.9% 72.1% 50.4% 58.3% 35.7% 63.4% 31.9% — 63/63 3.7 2.3 61.5% 64.9% 51.1% 58.2% 42.5% 59.5% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Frank Dancevic Jimmy Wang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2002 1506 104.6 +0.04 -3.24 0.682 44.0% +22 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — +0.04 2002 1504 101.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 1497 102.3 +2.47 -1.76 0.878 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06 2003 1488 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1486 103.8 -0.52 -3.23 0.760 44.9% — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.16 2004 1510 110.4 +0.26 +2.41 0.988 49.7% -9 — — 36.4% -0.36 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.34
20 2005 1473 101.3 -2.56 -1.42 0.825 46.8% +33 — — 27.8% -1.28 1–1 1–1 — +0.82 2005 1514 117.7 -2.25 +0.22 0.882 48.1% -13 — +76 33.3% -0.96 1–3 (25%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.04
21 2006 1558 120.1 +0.72 -1.24 0.948 48.9% -17 — +44 46.2% -0.31 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.23 2006 1555 121.8 -2.71 +1.39 0.893 47.9% -39 -86 +41 35.2% -1.06 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.81
22 2007 1697 136.2 +2.37 -1.18 1.003 49.7% -6 — -95 48.4% -0.16 8–8 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.87 2007 1571 112.6 -0.82 +0.23 1.110 52.1% -71 — — 56.3% +0.31 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.95
23 2008 1653 126.4 +1.17 -2.13 0.925 49.7% -7 — +11 44.7% -0.34 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.19 2008 1484 94.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 1699 134.9 +1.81 -2.41 0.940 48.8% +28 — +6 43.5% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 1663 112.5 -0.81 -0.02 0.891 48.2% — — +83 50.0% -0.42 0–2 3–0 (100%) — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 1696 122.6 -2.16 -3.36 0.759 45.7% +7 — — 36.4% -0.95 1–2 (33%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.72 2011 1545 113.4 -1.19 -0.36 0.998 50.3% — — — 40.0% 0.00 1–0 — — +0.06
27 2012 1605 113.3 -3.12 -6.61 0.432 37.6% +71 — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.47 2012 1634 117.0 +0.58 +0.84 0.981 49.4% -61 — — 40.0% 0.00 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.08
28 2013 1688 118.1 -0.19 -0.40 0.918 48.5% +6 — — 43.8% -0.44 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.09 2013 1587 108.1 -2.19 -1.68 0.735 44.5% — — +213 30.8% -1.46 1–1 1–0 — +0.11
29 2014 1655 115.5 -2.84 -3.79 0.710 44.6% +4 — — 33.3% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12 2014 1698 129.1 -2.74 -0.55 0.912 49.0% -83 — +191 44.0% -0.24 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.73
30 2015 1602 110.2 -0.20 -3.32 0.701 44.7% +41 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.04 2015 1677 113.7 -5.13 +6.83 0.562 45.7% — — — 0.0% -1.67 — 0–1 — -0.18
31 2016 1663 114.3 -0.72 -0.87 0.948 49.4% — — +100 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 1658 105.5 -0.71 -1.04 0.776 46.9% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1596 104.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1590 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1577 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1772 127.2 +0.40 -2.03 0.872 47.8% +8 — +18 41.8% -0.57 23–32 (42%) 38–34 (53%) 98.0 +1.31 — 1734 122.3 -1.99 +0.67 0.911 48.5% -42 -86 +117 37.9% -0.66 6–13 (32%) 12–16 (43%) 95.9 +0.76

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.