H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Frank Dancevic vs Peter Polansky H2H: 1-0
Frank Dancevic holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Polansky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Frank Dancevic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Frank Dancevic won the 2006 Canada Masters second round 7-6(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 41
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2006* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Frank Dancevic | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Peter Polansky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frank Dancevic | #406 | #65 | 783 | 1,773 | 54 | 89 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Peter Polansky | #1,475 | #110 | 495 | 1,676 | 11 | 39 | 22.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Frank Dancevic | Peter Polansky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #434 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #821 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #185 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #143 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #151 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #165 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #119 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #363 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |