H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Frank Dancevic vs Steve Darcis H2H: 0-1
Steve Darcis holds a 1–0 lead over Frank Dancevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Steve Darcis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Steve Darcis won the 2009 Wimbledon first round 6-4 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 41
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2009* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Steve Darcis | 6-4 7-6(4) 6-3 | Frank Dancevic | Match data |
| Jan 7, 2008 | Sydney | ATP 250 | Q1 | Hard | Steve Darcis | 6-3 6-4 | Frank Dancevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frank Dancevic | #406 | #65 | 783 | 1,773 | 54 | 89 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Steve Darcis | #756 | #38 | 1,362 | 1,832 | 92 | 122 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Frank Dancevic | Steve Darcis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #434 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #483 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #86 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #143 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #61 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #151 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2012 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #165 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #88 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #164 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #86 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #363 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,799 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |