H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Fred Stolle vs Robert Maud H2H: 2-0
Fred Stolle holds a 2–0 lead over Robert Maud in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fred Stolle leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Fred Stolle won the 1971 Chicago Wct third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 87
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 1971* | Chicago Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Fred Stolle | 6-2 6-4 | Robert Maud | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1969* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Fred Stolle | 19-17 2-6 6-0 7-5 | Robert Maud | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fred Stolle | #555 | #30 | 0 | 1,923 | 177 | 168 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Robert Maud | #326 | #57 | 0 | 1,804 | 123 | 131 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fred Stolle | Robert Maud | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 29–11 | 72.5% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 21–10 | 67.7% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 22–31 | 41.5% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 6–26 | 18.8% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #73 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #62 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #178 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1968 | 33–29 | 53.2% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1969 | 48–31 | 60.8% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1970 | 19–23 | 45.2% | — | 1,763 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1971 | 24–26 | 48.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1972 | 22–29 | 43.1% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1973 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1974 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #150 | 1,772 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1975 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,754 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #305 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,734 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |