H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Frederic Fontang vs David Rikl H2H: 0-1
David Rikl holds a 1–0 lead over Frederic Fontang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Rikl leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Rikl won the 1992 Prague third round 3-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 1992* | Prague | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | David Rikl | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | Frederic Fontang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frederic Fontang | #977 | #59 | 576 | 1,641 | 28 | 60 | 31.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| David Rikl | #852 | #41 | 809 | 1,685 | 53 | 92 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Frederic Fontang | David Rikl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #371 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #59 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #151 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 9–27 | 25.0% | #156 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #95 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #202 | 1,468 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #80 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #259 | 1,458 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #83 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,441 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #150 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,434 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #173 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,471 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #868 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |