H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Gael Monfils vs Milos Raonic H2H: 3-4

Milos Raonic holds a 4–3 lead over Gael Monfils in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 4–2 on hard courts, while Gael Monfils leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2016 Tour Finals round-robin match 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gael Monfils
France Age 39 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Milos Raonic
CAN Age 35 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 14, 2016 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Hard Milos Raonic #4 6-3 6-4 Gael Monfils #6 Match data
Jul 30, 2016* Canada Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Gael Monfils #14 6-4 6-4 Milos Raonic #7 Match data
Mar 18, 2016* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Milos Raonic #14 7-5 6-3 Gael Monfils #16 Match data
Jan 28, 2016* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Milos Raonic #14 6-3 3-6 6-3 6-4 Gael Monfils #25 Match data
Jun 13, 2013* Halle ATP 500 R32 Grass Gael Monfils #67 6-4 6-2 Milos Raonic #15 Match data
Oct 22, 2011* Stockholm ATP 250 SF Hard Gael Monfils #10 6-7(6) 6-4 6-3 Milos Raonic #29 Match data
Feb 12, 2011* San Jose ATP 250 SF Hard Milos Raonic #84 (w/o) Gael Monfils #12 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gael Monfils #325 #6 3,815 2,151 569 356 61.5% 0 0 0 3 10 13
Milos Raonic #634 #3 5,450 2,246 369 186 66.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gael Monfils Milos Raonic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 3–2 60.0% #239 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2005 25–22 53.2% #30 1,753 0 1 2009 0–1 0.0% #373 1,535 0 0
19 2006 20–19 51.3% #46 1,721 0 1 2010 3–4 42.9% #156 1,651 0 0
20 2007 21–21 50.0% #38 1,781 0 1 2011 30–18 62.5% #31 1,839 0 1
21 2008 27–16 62.8% #14 1,933 0 1 2012 42–20 67.7% #13 1,987 0 3
22 2009 42–19 68.9% #13 1,994 0 2 2013 41–21 66.1% #11 2,034 0 5
23 2010 42–19 68.9% #12 2,062 0 3 2014 47–20 70.1% #8 2,087 0 6
24 2011 37–17 68.5% #16 1,996 0 4 2015 32–15 68.1% #14 2,047 0 7
25 2012 18–10 64.3% #77 1,936 0 4 2016 52–19 73.2% #3 2,143 0 8
26 2013 33–22 60.0% #31 1,929 0 4 2017 29–14 67.4% #24 2,053 0 8
27 2014 32–15 68.1% #18 2,054 0 5 2018 31–18 63.3% #18 1,952 0 8
28 2015 33–18 64.7% #24 1,951 0 5 2019 23–13 63.9% #31 1,919 0 8
29 2016 40–17 70.2% #7 2,052 0 6 2020 23–10 69.7% #14 1,996 0 8
30 2017 20–14 58.8% #46 1,966 0 6 2021 6–4 60.0% #70 1,964 0 8
31 2018 30–20 60.0% #29 1,921 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2019 37–20 64.9% #10 1,920 0 8 2023 4–4 50.0% #317 1,909 0 8
33 2020 15–6 71.4% #11 1,934 0 10 2024 6–5 54.5% #238 1,903 0 8
34 2021 19–16 54.3% #21 1,910 0 10 — — — — — — —
35 2022 14–7 66.7% #52 1,934 0 11 — — — — — — —
36 2023 15–12 55.6% #74 1,925 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2024 25–21 54.3% #55 1,895 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2025 18–16 52.9% #68 1,771 0 13 — — — — — — —
39 2026 3–7 30.0% #325 1,685 0 13 — — — — — — —